On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 10:34:10AM +0100, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Is this a known issue, fixed in 1.4.3?
> There's nothing obviously dealing with it in
>
> http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/cipher/ChangeLog?rev=4003&view=markup>
>
> % gpg --version
> gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6
This
- The following text is an automated response to your message -
Hello, I'm on vacation from Monday, February 27 through Friday, March 3.
I'll be returning on Monday, March 6.
If you need IMMEDIATE URGENT help email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please do not use [EMAIL PROTECTED] unless it requi
Hi all,
I have read Adrian's tutorial at http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/subkeys and
related documents, and I am yet unsure how to apply this technique to my
situation where I have _two_ "insecure" locations instead of one.
You will find below: description of situation, my needs, how I did
achieve so
Is this a known issue, fixed in 1.4.3?
There's nothing obviously dealing with it in
http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/cipher/ChangeLog?rev=4003&view=markup>
% gpg --version
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.2.1-ecc0.1.6
[...]
% gpg --list-sigs 0xC9541FB2
[...]
gpg: O j: ... this is a bug (get
On 23/02/2006, at 7:26 AM, Dany wrote:
Hello,
I switched few years ago to fastmail.fm for several reasons :
- https + advanced protections when accessing from public terminal
(including url pseudo-scrambling)
- IMAP with SSL
- Text and only text for the webmail interface (no pop-up ad and no
Hello, When I try to decrypt this file:
27395867626 Feb 16 18:38 dati.tar.gpg
with the command:
gpg --decrypt dati.tar.gpg > dati.tar
I obtain this error:
gpg: fatal: zlib inflate problem: invalid literal/length code
secmem usage: 2048/2048 bytes in 4/4 blocks of pool 2048/32768
And the file d
Hello all,
I'm wondering how a gpgme_passphrase_cb_t-typed callback function could
receive a full list of UIDs for a key, instead of just the primary (1st) one.
I'm using gpgme 1.0.3.
Let me explain what I'd like to do: on a MUA point of view (Sylpheed-Claws,
thru its gpg plugins), a dialog uses
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:06:17AM -0500, Henry Hertz Hobbit wrote:
> Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 22, 2006, at 6:22 AM, Janusz A. Urbanowicz wrote:
> >
> >> And there is really no point in ecryptiong the whole access since the
> >> contents, the emails usually travel the