>SHA-1 implies DSA which would mean a DSA key. What happen if you specify
>SHA-256
>without explicitly selecting the subkey?
When I select the SHA256 algo, gpg returns an error that DSA will use nothing
more than a good 160 bit algo. Thanks for the help though.
-
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 02:22:22PM +0100, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> gpg --refresh 887BAE72 A32C2932
> gpg: requesting key A32C2932 from http server www.rachinsky.de
> gpg: key F66AFAF2: "Nicolas Rachinsky (SIGNING KEY - CERTIFICATION ONLY)
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" n
Nicky wrote:
> I have two encryption keys and three signing keys:
>
> pub 4096R/057AC4BC created: 2005-12-08 expires: never usage: CS
> sub 4096R/0DBBD3FD created: 2005-12-08 expires: never usage: SEA
> sub 4096g/E3DD0205 created: 2005-12-29 expires: 2006-04-29 usage: E
> sub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have two encryption keys and three signing keys:
pub 4096R/057AC4BC created: 2005-12-08 expires: never usage: CS
sub 4096R/0DBBD3FD created: 2005-12-08 expires: never usage: SEA
sub 4096g/E3DD0205 created: 2005-12-29 expires: 20
The most important thing in making archival CD backups is the dye, not
the reflective layer. Both gold and silver are used in the reflective
layer, and both are considered to be pretty much equivalent in terms of
aging.
The best dyes to use are phthalocyanine and metal stabilized cyanine.
It's di
Hallo,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> gpg --refresh 887BAE72 A32C2932
gpg: requesting key A32C2932 from http server www.rachinsky.de
gpg: key F66AFAF2: "Nicolas Rachinsky (SIGNING KEY - CERTIFICATION ONLY)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" not changed
gpg: key A32C2932: "Nicolas Rachinsky (Communication Key) <[EMAIL PR
