>Message: 8
>Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:43:01 -0500
>From: David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: updating a key's self-signature
>Yes, but note that it's still possible for someone to get the old
>self-sig from a keyserver.
what good would that do anyone once the old signature hash is no
l
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:32:27PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i have two keys that i use extensively for e-mailing
>
> one is a v4 rsa key (my default key), and the other is a v3 rsa key
> (for those correspondents who insist on or prefer the old key)
>
> both were signed with md5 when th
i have two keys that i use extensively for e-mailing
one is a v4 rsa key (my default key), and the other is a v3 rsa key
(for those correspondents who insist on or prefer the old key)
both were signed with md5 when they were generated years ago
when i try to sign them now, gnupg (1.4.2) prompts
Quoting Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:52:43 -0600, Aleksandar Milivojevic said:
$ openssl x509 -noout -text -in test.crt
Subject: C=CA, ST=Quebec, L=Montreal,
O=\x00T\x00e\x00s\x00t\x00_\x00I\x00m\x00p\x00r\x00i\x00m\x00e\x00u\x00r,
That looks much like a dou
Quoting Werner Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:52:43 -0600, Aleksandar Milivojevic said:
was able to import PKCS#12 file. Might be good idea if configure script was
checking if pinentry is installed and complaining if it wasn't, like
for other
That creates a dependency whi
hello,
i'm trying to install latest enigmail/gpg following the instructions
at enigmail website http://enigmail.mozdev.org/gpgconf.html but after
gpg --gen-key
i get only this error
C:\Documents and Settings\Germic>gpg --gen-key
gpg: C:/Documents and Settings/Germic/Data aplikacÝ/gnupg\gpg.con
Nicky wrote:
>What does the usage letters mean in the key listing?
> usage: CS
> usage: SEA
>What does SEA stand for? I think S and E stand for Signing and Encryption
>respectively but what about A and C?
>
>
Please have a look at the "Keytypes and changing them" thread
(http://lists.gnupg.o
Thomas Widhalm wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I already sent this email twice to this mailinglist, but it didn't appear at
>my mailserver, so I assume it didn't reach any of you.
>
>
Both of your eMails have appeared on the list, maybe the mailinglist
server is configured in a way that you don't receive your o
