Re: PKA

2005-12-26 Thread John W. Moore III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 John Clizbe wrote: > Without context it is difficult to tell. > > My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH. I believe your "Guess" to be correct. Since the Release of GnuPG 1.4.3 *will* contain support for PKA Key retrieval (amon

Re: Are gpg signatures considered attachments?

2005-12-26 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris wrote: > I've switched to that method, however, Kmail shows Inline OpenPGP as > deprecated. On the Mandriva Newibe list signatures using OpenPGP/MIME show > up as bad while those using Inline OpenPGP show up as good. Not sure if the > fault li

Re: PKA

2005-12-26 Thread John Clizbe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pawel Shajdo wrote: > Salve! > What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words... > > Vale! Without context it is difficult to tell. My guess would be Public Key Authentication; e.g. OpenSSH. Google also turned up "Private Key Access" and "Publ

Re: Are gpg signatures considered attachments?

2005-12-26 Thread Chris
On Monday 26 December 2005 11:43 am, Johan Wevers wrote: > Chris wrote: > >I know that is probably a lame question, however, I'm on several mailing > >lists that are bouncing my messages back to me because they are signed. > > The list owners are telling me this is because they don't allow > > atta

Re: using passphrase with special chars on Windows

2005-12-26 Thread Philipp Kern
Hans Müller wrote: > Hello, I have a key with a passphrase that contains special char's(german > extra chars). > On Linux all is ok. On Windows PGP can use the key. But gpg on Windows say > every time, that the > pasphrase are wrong. But the passphrase is ok. Have someone an idea??? You certainl

RE: PKA

2005-12-26 Thread Kiefer, Sascha
Not sure: PKI - Public Key Infrastructure PKA - Public Key Application ? HTH --esskar > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pawel Shajdo > Sent: Dienstag, 27. Dezember 2005 01:44 > To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org > Subject: PKA > > > Salve! >

PKA

2005-12-26 Thread Pawel Shajdo
Salve! What is PKA? Just have found in manual unknown words... Vale! -- Pawel I. Shajdo ___ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

using passphrase with special chars on Windows

2005-12-26 Thread Hans Müller
Hello, I have a key with a passphrase that contains special char's(german extra chars). On Linux all is ok. On Windows PGP can use the key. But gpg on Windows say every time, that the pasphrase are wrong. But the passphrase is ok. Have someone an idea??? _

new (2005-12-25) keyanalyze results (+sigcheck)

2005-12-26 Thread Jason Harris
New keyanalyze results are available at: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/2005-12-25/ Signatures are now being checked using keyanalyze+sigcheck: http://dtype.org/~aaronl/ Earlier reports are also available, for comparison: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ka/ Even earlier month

Re: Create key's over 4096 bit ????

2005-12-26 Thread Ryan Malayter
On 12/24/05, Ivan Boldyrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sqrt(2^1024)=2^512 The factoring algorithm with the best running time is still the GNFS. See http://tinyurl.com/dlyl5 GNFS has a running time of: O(e^((64/9*log(n))^1/3 * (log(log(n)))^2/3) When you subsitute 2^(keylength) for n in that equ

Re: Are gpg signatures considered attachments?

2005-12-26 Thread Johan Wevers
Chris wrote: >I know that is probably a lame question, however, I'm on several mailing >lists that are bouncing my messages back to me because they are signed. The >list owners are telling me this is because they don't allow attachments. You could switch to inline signatures instead of attached s