-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Was Thu, 27 Oct 2005, at 10:51:22 +0200,
when Realos wrote:
[about the personal web pages for public PGP keys]
> Yes this may be the best of both types of servers. It seems to be a
> very small change in protocol.
Well, the protocols ar
David Shaw wrote:
> You always have the option to not sign, of course. But you don't get
> to tell the keyholder what information he puts in his user ID string.
> You don't create that, and it must be signed completely or not signed
> at all.
Of course it is not possible to tell the key holder wh
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:45:09AM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
> > You don't. But it's not up to you as the signer - it's up to the key
> > holder to say how he wants to be known.
>
> Not really. It's up to me as the signer to affirm how I know the key
> holder. Or not sign at all if I can't veri
David Shaw wrote:
> Because they're not joined together it is not a real disambiguation.
> With two UIDs, it is possible for someone to remove one without
> affecting the other.
OK ... and what would that gain them?
> We've established that people are sometimes
> unwilling to sign "David Shaw"
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:18:50 -0500, Wes said:
> I also see --set-filename. However, I don't see any way to read the
> embedded file name.
[GNUPG:] BEGIN_DECRYPTION
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 62 1130429959 x
# mode timestamp filename
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT_LENGTH 63
[GNUPG:] DECRYPTION_OKAY
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 12:13:27PM +0200, Realos wrote:
>
> >> If I like to remove my signature from a certain key and/or uid, what is
> >> the best approach to that? Does it make sense to revoke the signature or
> >> just delete it? I find both of these commands in "gpg" software but am
> >> uncl
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:26:31PM -0500, Alex Mauer wrote:
> David Shaw wrote:
>
> >>>Some people
> >>>will not sign such a user ID though,
> >
> > It's not an issue of improving the trust, it's an issue of
> > disambiguation.
>
> Right, so why is it any better to have a key with:
> 0x992425
I found the answer I was looking for by enabling status-fd
[GNUPG:] BEGIN_DECRYPTION
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 62 167772160 small.doc
[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT_LENGTH 19456
[GNUPG:] DECRYPTION_OKAY
Wes
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lis
Topas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> When are we going to have ECC support in GnuPG?
>
Well, first it has to make it into the OpenPGP Standard. And usually to do
that, it would likely need to be part of some governmental or business
standard so that large numbers of end-users would want/need it.
Second, most
On 10/26/05 4:40 PM, "Tracy D. Bossong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Instead of --decrypt, use
>
> gpg --use-embedded-filename myfile.pgp
> Well, not instead but in addition to --decrypt.
> --use-embedded-filename is an option.
Ok, I see that now in the man page, just not in the command line u
>Not TRUE, I have 2 Keys listed on BL with the same email address.
>However they have different BL assigned passwords, so they are Separate
>Listings!
So, you have some difference on uids for these 2 keys? Like different
entry in name or description?
--
Realos
Realos wrote:
>
> Replacing an old key with updated one seems to be possible with
> biglumber and such other servers. Such servers have the disadvatage of
> not syncing with other public servers and only allowing one public key
> per email address.
>
> Are there any other drawbacks of Biglumber
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 06:33:37PM +0200, Topas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> When are we going to have ECC support in GnuPG?
There is an experimental patch at
http://alumnes.eps.udl.es/~d4372211/index.en.html
However, there will not be official support in GnuPG until the OpenPGP
standard gets ECC support.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Realos wrote:
>>It turns out that this way is even the best one (so far; and in the
>>"category" of the worldwide scattering of the keys): you can't upload
>>any key without authorization, and you can upload as much of them as you
>>want/need.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Topas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> When are we going to have ECC support in GnuPG?
>
Is it in OpenPGP yet?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 |X Against HTM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Disclaimer: I'm not a developer, hence I haven't crossposted to -devel.
Any answers given here are my own opinions and might be completely
wrong. You have been warned.
Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> (btw: I'm using solely Linux so I don't have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Realos wrote:
>>>If I like to remove my signature from a certain key and/or uid, what is
>>>the best approach to that? Does it make sense to revoke the signature or
>>>just delete it? I find both of these commands in "gpg" software but am
>>>unclear
Hi.
When are we going to have ECC support in GnuPG?
Regards,
topas.
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On 21 Oct 2005 09:36:27 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> *Is it possible to make gnupg ignore errors when decrypting
> files?*
>
> I'm trying to decrypt a symmetrically encrypted file, but get
> the following error message(s):
>
> C:\gpg\gpg>gpg -v -o c:\out.bkf -d d:\data.bkf.gpg
> gpg: CAST5 encr
Hello!
I can't answer all your questions, but I will go for those that I can.
Christoph Anton Mitterer schrieb:
> 2) GnuPG (and I think OpenPGP specifies that, too?) uses hybrid
> algortihm, meaning that when encrypting data, it's first encryptet
> using a symmetric algorithm (e.g. AES) with a
>
>OPTIONS
>
> Long options can be put in an options file (default
> "~/.gnupg/gpg.conf"). Short option names will not work - for
> exam- ple, "armor" is a valid option for the options file,
> while "a" is not. Do not write the 2 dashes, but simply the
> name of the
>> If I like to remove my signature from a certain key and/or uid, what is
>> the best approach to that? Does it make sense to revoke the signature or
>> just delete it? I find both of these commands in "gpg" software but am
>> unclear what to use.
>
>You need to revoke the signature once you have
Hi!
I first posted this under an old (but fitting) thread and got no
response. Sorry, if you already read it.
Nowadays there are quite some keys, which have several hundred
signatures on their UIDs. This is a good thing for the WoT, but it
clutters the local keyrings, as normally you don't have
>>
>> I don't understand why. If you trust the association of the Name and
>> key, how/why would having an email address in there as well improve
>> the
>> trust?
>
>It's not an issue of improving the trust, it's an issue of
>disambiguation. In my case, there are many different David Shaws out
>
Ismael Valladolid Torres wanted us to know:
>Joost van Baal wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:38:49PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
>>>It's not an issue of improving the trust, it's an issue of
>>>disambiguation. In my case, there are many different David Shaws out
>>>there, including a furniture
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:46:20 -0400, Richard Jensen said:
> Is there a way to set the default key to use for signing?
> In Enigmail it uses the email address to choose the key, but
> in gpgol I always get a dialog and need to select the key from
> a list.
That is a missing feature.
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:23:30 +0200, Realos said:
> http://kai.iks-jena.de/pgp/gpg/gpg5.html (German). Manpage only
> describes how to enter these option on command line but no special not
> about configuration file is give.
Hmmm, from the man page:
OPTIONS
Long options can be put in an
>It turns out that this way is even the best one (so far; and in the
>"category" of the worldwide scattering of the keys): you can't upload
>any key without authorization, and you can upload as much of them as you
>want/need.
Yes this may be the best of both types of servers. It seems to be a ver
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:40:49 -0700 (PDT), Tracy D Bossong said:
> Instead of --decrypt, use
> gpg --use-embedded-filename myfile.pgp
Well, not instead but in addition to --decrypt.
--use-embedded-filename is an option.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
G
I was wondering if there is a good documentation about how to edit
gpg.conf file. Over the last weeks I have gained quite an acceptable
understanding of gpg but still need to go a log way before feeling
realy comfortable with advanced options.
I would like to define my own policy for WoT and thus
30 matches
Mail list logo
