Byla godzina 09:58:23 w Wednesday 05 October, gdy do autobusu wsiadl kanar
i wrzasnal:"Johan Wevers!!! Bilecik do kontroli!!!" A on(a) na to:
LS>> What do you think about using gnome-keyring to store GnuPG passwords?
JW> It would require users to install many bulky Gnome libs. I don't think
JW>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 10:41:17AM -0700, amit bhalerao wrote:
> Is there any way i can validate that decryption process has been
> successful base on error code? Do you have any document which list
> down possible error code and cause of failure.
Use --status-fd and read doc/DETAILS in t
Hi Werner, hi all!
I've a problem with "PIN keeping" in gpg-agent (version numbers below).
Everythings works fine: I start up gpg-agent:
# eval `gpg-agent -v --enable-ssh-support --daemon \
--log-file /home/jsl/ga.log --debug-level expert --default-cache-ttl-ssh\
2`
and I can see my "new" ke
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 05:02:52PM -0700, amit bhalerao wrote:
> I want to decrypt a gpg encrypted document using a GPG. Is there
> any way i can decrypt it in a non -interactive mode so that it
> doesn't ask for passphrase.I want to execute the command in shell
> script.
> Any pointer t
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005 14:42:51 +0200 (MET DST), Johan Wevers said:
> That depends on your definition. But I guess it would be allowed to
> distribute it with a Linux distribution. From the LICENSE file from
Debian does not allow this - maybe it was included in the former
non-free repository but that
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of Libgcrypt 1.2.2.
Libgcrypt is a general purpose library of cryptographic building
blocks. It is based on the code used in GnuPG.
This is a bug fix release solving a weakness in the random number
generator when used by forking servers. Ther
Werner Koch wrote:
>pgp5 can't be part of Debian because it is clearly non-free software.
That depends on your definition. But I guess it would be allowed to
distribute it with a Linux distribution. From the LICENSE file from
a pgp 5.0i source (I still have it, although I never succeeded in
compi
Klaus Fuerstberger wrote:
>just a "Sign Only" Key! At least for my pgp5i Version from debian/oldstable.
One warning: don't generate production keys with that version. It is known
to have a buggy random generator so its keys are weak.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
>Seems there is an error in the email you sent. Just thought I'd let you
>know that your email wasn't , at least for me, signed correctly.
>
>
>
Yepp i know something went wrong with enigmail :-/.
Greetings,
Jörn
___
Gnupg-us
On Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:55:34 +0200, Klaus Fuerstberger said:
> "expire" command, the Key becomes again a "Sign Only" public Key for
> PGP5. So now the strange thing. When I try to set the expiration Date
PGP 5 is known to be full of bugs - some of them are severe security
bugs. For example it ca
Lukasz Stelmach wrote:
>What do you think about using gnome-keyring to store GnuPG passwords?
It would require users to install many bulky Gnome libs. I don't think
that's a good idea.
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fiction site:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.xs4all.
Hi,
Alphax said the following on 10/04/05 14:56:
>>a time ago I created a "Sign Only" DSA Key with an ElGamal Encrypt
>>Subkey. Now I noticed that it is not possible to encrypt a message with
>>PGP to this Public Key because PGP only sees the "sign only" primary Key
>>and not the
12 matches
Mail list logo
