On Sunday 11 September 2005 09:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Message: 1
> >Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 01:27:02 -0500
> >From: John B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Hushmail troubles...again
> >To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-asci
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 08:17:57PM +0200, Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
> I tried to verify a clearsigned (inline signed) message.
>
> Used digest algorhythm Hash: SHA512
>
> This is what I get when I try to verify the message:
>
> "gpg: invalid armor header: www.pgp.com"
>
> When I made a remark ab
I tried to verify a clearsigned (inline signed) message.
Used digest algorhythm Hash: SHA512
This is what I get when I try to verify the message:
"gpg: invalid armor header: www.pgp.com"
When I made a remark about this I was pointed in the direction that it
maybe had something to do with wrappi
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:41:36 +0100, Bob Henson said:
> Is there a version of GnuPG 1.9.19 compiled for Windows?
No. I have not tried to build it. Probably some minor things need to
get fixed.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
G
Alphax wrote:
The time is ripe for a GPG variant: ("GPG-lean" ?): a public key
encryption utility with no built-in e-mail ties and no attempt
whatsoever to incorporate the solution for the authentication
problem. (For the majority of us, fingerprint-exchange-by-voice
>>is perfectly adequate).
Is there a version of GnuPG 1.9.19 compiled for Windows?
Regards,
Bob
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Hello!
We are pleased to announce the availability of GnuPG 1.9.19 - the
branch of GnuPG featuring the S/MIME protocol. You should consider
using GnuPG 1.9 if you want to use the GPG-AGENT or GPGSM. The
GPG-AGENT is also helpful when using the stable GPG version 1.4 or if
you want to check out i
David Shaw wrote:
>It wasn't an idle suggestion. You can assume that I do, in fact, know
>that this is possible, or I wouldn't have suggested it. Why on earth
>an email address is relevant here I have no idea. You don't need
>anything more than the IP address.
That depends. If that IP address
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:34:25 -0400, David Shaw said:
> Aha! I found the problem. It's actually a bug in the German
> translation. I was testing in English, so never saw it. I'll file a
> bug for that. Thanks for your help running this one down.
I was sure that gettext points out such problem
John Clizbe wrote:
> Bob Henson wrote:
>
>>> A P.S. to the last message. I added the above lines and tried again, and
>>> neither refreshing a key from the keyserver, uploading a key, nor
>>> downloading a new key cause the "clean" to run.
>>>
>>> I must be doing something silly in the set-up.
Hello,
I recently compiled GPA on my Mac running Tiger, and I got the
following error when I tried to run gpa (in xterm):
$ gpa
dyld: Symbol not found: _pth_connect
Referenced from: /usr/local/lib/libgpgme.11.dylib
Expected in: flat namespace
Trace/BPT trap
$
Is there a way to fix this?
11 matches
Mail list logo