-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Does anyone have solid written key signing policy?
I ask because i was just asked myself, and just gave a rough verbal of
my own policy. But i would like to see any others before i commit myself
to anything on paper.
(I'm Trying To Push For GnuPG To Be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron Metzke wrote:
>
> Well thats a great bash script which i will incorperate into my *nix box
> :).
> Basically what im trying to do is build a php frontend to gnupg which
> can act like a keyserver. The keys are imported using --fast-import
> wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2005 11:31 pm, Cameron Metzke wrote:
>
>>Basically what im trying to do is build a php frontend to gnupg which
>>can act like a keyserver.
>
>
> But then keyservers don't delete keys - expired or not.
>
On Sunday 04 September 2005 11:31 pm, Cameron Metzke wrote:
> Basically what im trying to do is build a php frontend to gnupg which
> can act like a keyserver.
But then keyservers don't delete keys - expired or not.
Think about it, when I use a keyserver, I still want to be able to retrieve an
e
Berend Tober wrote:
> Anyway, I've looked at WinPT and GPGee and one other GUI wrapper
> around gnupg, but they all of course are victims of this MS Excel
> "feature", and furthermore none of them satisfy my other need to be
> able to support multiple persons signing any given document
When I s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2005 9:20 pm, Cameron Metzke wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>
>
> Message was signed on 01/01/1970 12:59 am with unknown key 0x68312280.
> The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
> gpgkeys: key 889282586831228
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sunday 04 September 2005 9:20 pm, Cameron Metzke wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>
>
> Message was signed on 01/01/1970 12:59 am with unknown key 0x68312280.
> The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
> gpgkeys: key 889282586831228
On Sunday 04 September 2005 9:20 pm, Cameron Metzke wrote:
> Hi,
Message was signed on 01/01/1970 12:59 am with unknown key 0x68312280.
The validity of the signature cannot be verified.
gpgkeys: key 8892825868312280 not found on keyserver
If you are going to sign emails, PLEASE make sure your key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Is there any command that will delete expired keys from a keyring ?
I have had a look through the docs but cant seem to find anything, so i
thought i would ask the guru's :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFDG1c
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:39:52PM -0400, Dan Mundy wrote:
Berend Tober wrote:
I hate to admit that I still use MS-Excel rather than an open source
spread sheet tool, but workplace requirements constrain my fate...
Has anyone else managed a work-around for this fl
On Sunday 04 September 2005 14:48, Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> > Oskar L. wrote:
> >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>>I choose to live alone (for security reasons) so what I worry most about
> >>>are keyloggers and microphones. Here in Finland the police have a
> >>> special g
On Sun, 04 Sep 2005 13:42:45 +0200, Werner Koch said:
> directory where Windows searches for DLLs (e.g. c:\winnt\system32),
> stop Outlook, run the command "regsvr32 outlgpg.dll" and start
Small bug: Run
regsvr32 gpgol.dll
and not outlgpg.dll (which was the old name of the DLL).
Shalom-S
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:39:52PM -0400, Dan Mundy wrote:
> Berend Tober wrote:
> > I hate to admit that I still use MS-Excel rather than an open source
> > spread sheet tool, but workplace requirements constrain my fate...
> > Has anyone else managed a work-around for this flaw? (Aside from the
>
Jean-David Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>My guess is that if someone serious about this, such as a large government
>agency, were to do it, they might do something really simple, like replace
>some board in your machine (modem?) with another one just like it but with
>the keylogger on it.
See
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Once a computer or other device that needs secure access is sufficiently
> protected, it becomes cheaper for a large government agency to resort to
> bribery or torture to get the information it wants. Assuming they do not
> wish to try bribery, ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean-David Beyer wrote:
> Oskar L. wrote:
>
>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
I don't know of any transparent keyboards off-hand (I can check our
local computer store tomorrow, since they have one there).
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks!
>>>
>>>
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oskar L. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> I don't know of any transparent keyboards off-hand (I can check our
>> local computer store tomorrow, since they have one there).
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>> But, I will say this. There is a keylogger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know of any transparent keyboards off-hand (I can check our
> local computer store tomorrow, since they have one there).
Thanks!
> But, I will
> say this. There is a keylogger out that goes between the keyboard plug
> and the case.
There are several, see http
Hi,
I have just released a first version of GPGol, the new GPG plugin for
MS Outlook. The intention is to replace the old G-DATA plugin by more
modern code. We basically rewrote it from scratch and thus a lot of
bugs are to be expected.
Successful tests have only be done with Outlook 2003 and t
Oskar L. wrote:
>"Neil Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>What makes you think a keylogger goes 'inside' a keyboard? The cable
>>connection is just as easy and an internal unit (on the inside of the
>>socket on the box) even better.
>>
>>
>
>I keep my case open, so I would notice t
"Neil Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What makes you think a keylogger goes 'inside' a keyboard? The cable
> connection is just as easy and an internal unit (on the inside of the
> socket on the box) even better.
I keep my case open, so I would notice that. There enough space for a
keylogg
On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 10:02:31 -0400, Jeffrey Tadlock said:
> Am I typing something wrong? Here is what I typed:
> gpg --encrypt-files -r "System Administrator" -z 0 < sql-db.bak > sql-db.gpg
Sorry, I missed that you are using --encrypt-files. This command is
deifferent to --encrypt in that it ta
On Sunday 04 September 2005 1:29 am, Oskar L. wrote:
> Can anyone recommend a transparent keyboard, or any kind of keyboard witch
> makes it easy to check that a keylogger has not been installed inside
What makes you think a keylogger goes 'inside' a keyboard? The cable
connection is just as easy
23 matches
Mail list logo
