So, I've been going through the samples, and I'm still sort of unclear about
how to get the right public key read in so I can do an encryption. I'm
looking at the following function:
gpgme_error_t gpgme_op_encrypt (gpgme_ctx_t ctx, gpgme_key_t recp[],
gpgme_encrypt_flags_t flags, gpgme_data_t pla
Be careful with this. First of all both the second and third packet can be
implemented as the first packet type. Second encouraging users to place
extra data into theie keys is just asking for problem. Imaginge when
somebody decides to attaches a 50 MiB mpeg to their key, and uploads it to
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
In reply to Michael W. Lucas's message sent 2005-08-11 20:42:
> I'm trying to learn if there's a tool to trace the web of trust
> between two keys.
>
> For example, suppose I get an email from someone I've never heard of
> and want to learn if
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 08:42:04PM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
> I'm trying to learn if there's a tool to trace the web of trust
> between two keys.
>
> For example, suppose I get an email from someone I've never heard of
> and want to learn if there is any valid chain of signatures leading
>
Hi folks,
I'm trying to learn if there's a tool to trace the web of trust
between two keys.
For example, suppose I get an email from someone I've never heard of
and want to learn if there is any valid chain of signatures leading
from me to him.
I imagine that this is a difficult problem. :-) H
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 09:54:59PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Jason Harris wrote:
> > Fetching them from keyserver.kjsl.com is now possible with gnupg-1.4.2.
> > To patch pks, add this to the middle of decode_mpi() (in pgputil.c):
> >
> > /* skip packets with 0-length
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:29:01PM -0500, R. Jensen wrote:
>
> As to copying the data that shows up as part of Microsoft's error
> reporting. The text is not selectable.
>
> So, I don't see any path going forward that will help resolve the
> problem on my system:
> Dr. Watson doesn't seem to ge
On Thu Aug 11 2005; 12:29, R. Jensen wrote:
> As to permissions, I checked and I'm in the administrators group
> on my machine--I can't think what other permissions I'd need. :-)
Then it's propably a bug. But I never got such a message so it is
propably a combination of some 'events'.
> Dr.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 12:02:17PM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:30:09PM -0500, John Clizbe wrote:
> > Tracked down the two offending keys and deleted them with 1.4.1. They both
> > failed to import from a keyserver with 1.4.2 with the same mpi error, so I'm
> > marking
Timo Schulz wrote:
>
> The primary site for downloads is ftp.g10code.com/pub/outlgpg.
>
When I connect to ftp.g10code.com, there is no pub directory.
[I'm doing anonymous FTP with WS_FTP].
There is a g10code directory and in there is an outlgpg directory.
I got the zip of the 0.99.4 version date
You wrote:
> running Outlook 2003 SP1. Re-registering the plugin doesn't resolve
> the problem either. Would any log files, screen prints, etc help? If
> so, please specify and I will be glad to send them on.
No, the logging code is not complete yet. As I said, the most
valuable information is
Hello,
I have payed with the idea of using experimental subpackets of 'User
Attribute Packet' and here is what I came up with:
Named Attribute Subpacket (type 100)
--
Subpacket specific data:
magic identification number
datatype - identifier - eg. 4 - UTF8
Where I live it was 8/11/2005 4:57 AM, when Timo Schulz wrote:
>>>useful to have the debug output of Dr. Watson. Please compress it
>>>before you send it because it's very large. You can either send these
>>>reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) directly.
>>
>>How do I enable t
Timo Schulz wrote:
>On Wed Aug 10 2005; 17:06, R. Jensen wrote:
>
>
>
>>and installed it. Now, in the explorer windows the dll does
>>show up a 0.99.4, but the tab in Outlook says 0.99.3.
>>
>>
>
>This is an error in the code. We already fixed it.
>
>
>
>
>>"Save options in the registry".
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 13:30, R. Jensen wrote:
> and Enigmail (0.92.0.0). I signed the email there, but sent it
> to the Windows XP Pro box where I'm running Outlook 2003.
>
> On the Windows box I'm running GPG 1.41.
This is weird, I use GPG 1.4.2 and I have no problems. We definitely
need to check
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 13:44, R. Jensen wrote:
> Where can I get the 0.99.4 version? I downloaded from
> http://www.g10code.de/p-outlgpg.html last week and that is
> the 0.99.2 version I'm having problems with. The link on that
The primary site for downloads is ftp.g10code.com/pub/outlgpg.
> > use
On Wed Aug 10 2005; 17:06, R. Jensen wrote:
> and installed it. Now, in the explorer windows the dll does
> show up a 0.99.4, but the tab in Outlook says 0.99.3.
This is an error in the code. We already fixed it.
> "Save options in the registry". When I start Outlook, I
> get one that initially
The issue you have is caused from the newer version of
GnuPG. Timo is doing a great job of writing a newer
version, but with all new releases it takes time to
find the bugs.
for a working beta of my Ol03 installer goto
http://www.sperryservices.com/gnutools.htm
The installer takes care of some
The setting for cached mode can cause bandwidth
problems on the network. you may be in violation of
your IT policy by implememting this. Some companies
have terminated users for such actions. It also can
pose a security threat as the raise in bandwidth, if
by many users, could over load their IDS
I love the German language. I don't speak it, can't
read it. And sure as heck have too many emails a day
to filter through. The mech you speak of was the
german list, made by german speaking people. I have a
funny feeling those who speak german in this list, are
on the same german list we speak
How does this interact with DKIM?
--
ciao,
Marco
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:32:33 +0200 (MET DST), Johan Wevers said:
> Are uid's also stored in the secret key? I thought they only existed
For historic reasons the user IDs are also stored in the secring.gpg.
This is an internal detail and will eventually change.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
___
22 matches
Mail list logo
