On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:29:33 -0400, Charly Avital said:
> I have grown tired to receive out office notifications from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] everytime I post to the list.
> That address is now on my junk list.
I have disabled mail delivery to that account.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
_
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:54:39 +0200, Janusz A Urbanowicz said:
> The aim of the secure viewer then was to make difficult to obtain eyes-only
> message text as a file or a pipe. It checked if output is a live tty,
Okay, that is something different. I was solely speaking of a tempest
resistant view
I have grown tired to receive out office notifications from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] everytime I post to the list.
That address is now on my junk list.
Charly
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-
Your quote message got through fine.
Are you sure you used the correct e-mail address (i.e. the e-mail
address you used to subscribe to the list) when you sent the post that
was refused?
Your public key AD24CFB593B61FDD displays 4 different UIDs, none of them
is identical to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ch
Werner Koch wrote the following on 6/29/05 10:36 AM:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:55:02 +0200, Janusz A Urbanowicz said:
>
>
>>Some form of secure viewer was present in PGP 2.3 and 2.6 which were FLOSS.
>
>
> Huh, that's new to me. Both versions are pure command line tools
> without a graphical pa
Hello
I subscribed yesterday to the list, got the typical welcome msg, but
my posting of today got refused, reason being that I am a non
member. I am using the gmane fontend in order to communicate with the
list. Could anybody tell me what is the reason for this strange
behaviou
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 04:36:53PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:55:02 +0200, Janusz A Urbanowicz said:
>
> > Some form of secure viewer was present in PGP 2.3 and 2.6 which were FLOSS.
>
> Huh, that's new to me. Both versions are pure command line tools
> without a graphica
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:55:02 +0200, Janusz A Urbanowicz said:
> Some form of secure viewer was present in PGP 2.3 and 2.6 which were FLOSS.
Huh, that's new to me. Both versions are pure command line tools
without a graphical part. No way to make use fo filtered fonts.
I am not sure what kind o
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 04:58:52AM -0400, Charly Avital wrote:
> > However, GnuPG can call other programs to do other tasks (keyserver
> > access programs, JPEG viewers for photo IDs), so it's not impossible
> > that GnuPG could call an external secure viewer program. I don't know
> > of one offh
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:49:54 +0200 (MET DST), Johan Wevers said:
> Are you saying that my idea to output a picture with tempest-resistant
> fonts won't couse a problem, or that even if tempest-resistant fonts are
> patented only the fonts from the above URL can be used for this purpose?
In case s
10 matches
Mail list logo
