-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Psy-Kosh wrote:
>
>
> Not to mention that anyone can sign keys, independant of the will of the
> key's owner. (I think a protocol to actually remove unwanted sigs from a
> key may be useful. (ie, a way to have the removal propagated by the
> keyserve
Chris De Young chud.net> writes:
> > How can I select and delete the last item?
> gpg --delete-keys A5F59887
Thanks. I'm pretty much brand new to gpg. I tried some other things (I
no longer remember quite what), but whatever I tried I kept getting the first
key and decided it was better to as
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:17:44 + (UTC), Skip Montanaro wrote
> I recently installed GnuPG on my Mac laptop, not realizing it
> was apparently installed at some previous time. After the
> install I generated a new key but gave the same id as an
> earlier key. My keyring now has three keys:
>
[...]
> pub 1024D/A5F59887 2005-06-11
> uid Skip Montanaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> sub 2048g/B2FD262D 2005-06-11
>
> Note that the first and last keys have the same uid. Everything I've tried
> always selects the first item. How can I select and delete the last ite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just wondering (as you do)... as great as it is signing other people's
keys, someones public key does actually reveal quite a lot about the
real world movements and aquaintances of the keyholder as it accumulates
signatories does it not
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Bill Thompson wrote:
> Yes, but if you want to remain anonymous what is the point of
> cryptographically signing your e-mail? You can't have it both ways.
Sure you can. Read up on anonymous and pseudonymous mail systems. But
that's not the danger what Shaun was talking about.
I recently installed GnuPG on my Mac laptop, not realizing it was apparently
installed at some previous time. After the install I generated a new key
but gave the same id as an earlier key. My keyring now has three keys:
% gpg --list-keys
/Users/skip/.gnupg/pubring.gpg
--
Bill Thompson wrote:
>Yes, but if you want to remain anonymous what is the point of
>cryptographically signing your e-mail? You can't have it both ways.
Assuring a mail comes from the same (unkbown) sender. The cracker of the
"improved" MS DRM system used it this way: his mails (actually, newsgro
Bill Thompson wrote:
Yes, but if you want to remain anonymous what is the point of
cryptographically signing your e-mail?
Guarantee of continuity of particular communication thread
(as opposed to the guarantee of correspondent's identity).
C. Rok
__
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:13:02 +0100
Shaun Lipscombe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just wondering (as you do)... as great as it is signing other people's
> keys, someones public key does actually reveal quite a lot about the
> real world movements and aquaintances of the keyholder as it accumulates
>
Shaun Lipscombe wrote:
Just wondering (as you do)... as great as it is signing other people's
keys, someones public key does actually reveal quite a lot about the
real world movements and aquaintances of the keyholder as it accumulates
signatories does it not?
The main purpose of Web-of-trust i
Hi list,
Is it possible to check if a file has been signed or encrypted; like:
this a file, tell me if you are able to understand it!
regards,
Sascha
___
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-us
Thanks.
But S/MIME and PGP/MIME works fine already. ;-)
What is still (partly) unfinsihed is PGP/INLINE.
Regards,
Sascha
Shaun Lipscombe schrieb:
* Sascha Kiefer wrote:
Hi list,
i'm writing on a programm which verifies and decrypts messages as they
arrive. It it is fully S/MIME (using
Hi list,
i'm writing on a programm which verifies and decrypts messages as they
arrive.
It it is fully S/MIME (using M$ Crypto API) and PGP/MIME (GnuPG) compatible.
The hardest problem i face is to detect inline PGP parts and handling
them correctly:
* if the charset != us-ascii inside textm
Atom Smasher wrote:
does anyone know if this is true?
http://www.chromance.de/wtf/lol.htm
if it is...
It's not.
See http://www.dansdata.com/keyghost.htm for the source of the images,
and "If you do a search for dept. of homeland security's logo, it is a
blue colour circular logo with an eag
15 matches
Mail list logo
