-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks everyone who took the time to answer my question !
It was more an academic question, as the key has been decommissioned
anyway. We just wondered what the problem was.
Cheers,
Karl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
C
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 12:33:15PM +0100, Karl Kashofer wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Would anyone know why this key can not be imported into GnuPG ?
>
> Keyserver: 0x133CC3FD
>
> It looks OK to me, imports fine in PGP and the self signature was made
> one second after the key creation date. No hints in PGP
I've searched via Google the above message and found
one post that said to remove the "--no-tty" from the
gpg.conf file. Well, I don't have a line with that
parameter in the file.
Ideas?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best sp
On Friday 20 May 2005 7:50 pm, Alex Mauer wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> > Keyservers don't delete signatures so every time you self-sign, it
> > remains on the keyserver. Deleting the signature once a key has been sent
> > to a keyserver is pointless because refreshing the key will always import
Neil Williams wrote:
> Keyservers don't delete signatures so every time you self-sign, it remains on
> the keyserver. Deleting the signature once a key has been sent to a keyserver
> is pointless because refreshing the key will always import all the old
> signatures.
>
What's the reasoning be
Sean C. wrote:
[snip]
> This would not be the end-all be-all of anti-spam tools. It would just be a
> method to authenticate mail as really originating from a particular domain.
> You
> would still use other tools (eg SpamAssassin, Norton, etc.) to figure out if
> the
> sender is a known spammer/
>Neil Williams writes:
>How do you guarantee that From: cannot be spoofed - it sounds like you are
>delegating that to the individual ISP / domain holder. I'm concerned that
the
>domain is too blunt as an instrument against spam and that it will remain
>easy to send spam from: aol.com and hotmail.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Radu Hociung wrote:
[snip]
> That's why I am asking the question: could PGP cope if all, or a
> significant proportion of all domains were to enable some kind of email
> transport authentication?
I don't see any connection. PGP i
> - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
> Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 10:15:35 +0100
> From: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Keyservers and the future
> To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
>
> Are you proposing a completel
On Thursday 19 May 2005 8:15 pm, Radu Hociung wrote:
> Depending on proposal, email authentication would require between 1
> key/domain owner
Is that a completely different key to another domain used by the same owner?
I've got many domains but I only want one main key.
If someone trusts codehel
10 matches
Mail list logo
