Timo Schulz wrote:
>Then I guess the easiest way is that I remove the 'supports 95/NT'
>string because I expect at least an average PC system. And this means
>at least ME and a recent Explorer version.
Hmmm. I see win98 still being used a lot, but ME was such a crappy version
that I rarely see it
On Sat Apr 09 2005; 22:41, Erpo wrote:
> It's ok to list Windows NT 4 as a requirement for running a program, if
> that's really the only requirement. It's ok to list Windows NT 4 with
[snip]
Then I guess the easiest way is that I remove the 'supports 95/NT'
string because I expect at least an a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
David Shaw wrote:
| Authentication is signing a challenge (like ssh does). The
| Authentication stuff can be used to log in to a machine using your GPG
key.
|
Is there any public documentation on how to implement this? The only way
I've seen thus
On Sat, 2005-04-09 at 22:41 -0700, Erpo wrote:
> It's not ok to list SHELL32.dll v4.32 or later as a requirement for
> running a program. This does not mean it's not ok to _have_ SHELL32.dll
> v4.32 or later as a requirement for running a program. The difference?
While I totally agree with your po
