Hi:
Can you please advise me on how you guys get your message sent to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] I did join the list about two weeks ago. Up till now, none of the
request that I sent to the group ever went through. I have been sending my
request in plain text. Can you please forward this request to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Johan Wevers wrote:
>
> > machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
> > was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
>
> Yes. I also did it in the past. It works.
>
>
> > Is win95 supported at
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:33:13PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the meaning of usage/capabilities listings for
> keys(shown, for
> example, during edit-keys interactive sessions)?
> S -> sign
> E -> encrypt
> C -> ?
> A -> ?
> looking at doc/DETAILS I found
> C -> certification
> A ->
What is the meaning of usage/capabilities listings for
keys(shown, for
example, during edit-keys interactive sessions)?
S -> sign
E -> encrypt
C -> ?
A -> ?
looking at doc/DETAILS I found
C -> certification
A -> authentication
But I dont' understand the difference between
certification,
authenti
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:23:06PM +0200, Thomas Hühn wrote:
> I think I have missed that mail. Could someone mail it to me, please?
>
> Or is it a web site? Google doesn't know about it.
http://www.kernelconcepts.de/products/Smartcard-HOWTO.txt
___
Gn
Am Freitag 01 April 2005 13:57 schrieb Peter L. Smilde:
> "OpenPGP smartcard HOWTO", section "Advanced features", subsection
> "Using the card only for subkeys".
I think I have missed that mail. Could someone mail it to me, please?
Or is it a web site? Google doesn't know about it.
Thomas
Jan Niehusmann schrieb:
> Isn't this exactly the approach described in the thread "Clarification
> on purpose of subordinate keys" two days ago? There was a very nice
> step-by-step description posted by Dirk Traulsen.
You're right. I already knew the "purpose", but the thread clarified
this speci
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:57:51PM +0200, Peter L. Smilde wrote:
> This is OK for the offline secret keyring. But my online secret keyring
> shouldn't contain the secret primary keysigning key (as before).
Isn't this exactly the approach described in the thread "Clarification
on purpose of subordi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Another question araised while testing my new OpenPGP smartcard:
I have an offline keysigning key and would like to add a signing and an
encryption key to it for online use, with the secret parts of the last
two on the smartcard. So I performe
Johan Wevers wrote:
machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
Yes. I also did it in the past. It works.
Is win95 supported at all?
Do you ask if WinPT still supports W95? Not really. It works without
any
10 matches
Mail list logo
