Steve M. Fabac, Jr. wrote:
> (after renaming gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.sig to
>gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc )
Why did you rename the file? Not that it matters, gnupg will ignore
extensions anyway, but .asc is usually used for base-64 encoded
files. The signature on the source is in binary format.
>I get
proba esto:(try this!!)
echo "cowards die many times"| gpg --passphrase-fd 0 --output
c:\test\wes_test.txt --decrypt c:\test\wes_test.txt.asc < c:\passphrase.txt
===***
saludos
Ing. Pedro Fernandez Aphal
Am 29 Mar 2005 um 11:15 hat Werner Koch geschrieben:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:27:27 -0500, John Harrold said:
>
> > given the time frame it probably happened when I was trying to unexpire the
> > key F65A739E. Can you elaborate on the reasons for using a separate key for
> > signing messages?
>
Steve M. Fabac, Jr. said the following on 29/03/2005 23:29:
and followed the steps to verify the
archive by running
gpg --verify gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc
(after renaming gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.sig to
gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc )
Curious as to why you had to rename?
gpg --verify gnupg.1.4.1.tar.gz.sig
/
Hello,
When I tried to install GnuPG 1.4.1 and WinPT 0.9.90 on an old win95
machine, GnuPG worked fine but WinPT gave the error that WS_32.dll
was missing. Can I just copy that file from a newer windows version?
Is win95 supported at all?
--
ir. J.C.A. Wevers // Physics and science fict
Fafa Diliha Romanova said the following on 25/03/2005 21:34:
> but i'm trying to get a decent gpg+mutt setup.
A little out-of-date but have a look at:
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/Mutt-GnuPG-PGP-HOWTO.html
[big snip]
> is it possible making my signature more good looking? like this,
> maybe
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:04:17 +0100, Thomas Marx said:
> every key is listed twice. The difference is the usage of the slash and
> the back slash.
I just checked it and the reason for the duplicate listing is that we
use a caseinsensitive compare but care about slash and backslash. In
this regard
Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote:
Please don't toppost.
>> In addition, I've discovered there are more and more of those
>> that simply filter all messages with unsolicited attachmets
>> straight into trash, on the (not entirely unreasonable) assumption
>> that such attachments are viruses and/or such
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:29:52 -0600, Steve M Fabac, said:
> gpg --verify gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc
> (after renaming gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.sig to
> gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc )
Out of curiosity, why did you rename it? Using .sig works just fine.
> gpg: Signature made Tue Mar 15 10:29:15 2005 CST usi
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:23:52 -0800 (PST), D Borkovic said:
> Sometimes I want to encrypt a message when my memory stick is
> not available. The public keyring is available. However, Gnupg
> will NOT encrypt a message when a secret keyring is not available.
No problem here:
$ ls -la
total 64
dr-x
I have downloaded the gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz from
http://mirrors.rootmode.com/ftp.gnupg.org/
as well as gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.sig
and followed the steps to verify the
archive by running
gpg --verify gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc
(after renaming gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.sig to
gnupg-1.4.1.tar.gz.asc )
I get:
Exactly!
So how do you prevent this?
What signature method do you use?
I still haven't gotten any reply to my post.
All the best,
-- Fafa
- Original Message -
From: "C. D. Rok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: how to beautify gpg+mutt
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 11:58:24 +0700, Samphan Raruenrom said:
> Are there anyone being able to use GPG 1.4.0/1.4.1 on Windows successfully?
Works for me on W2000 and I know that it works for about everyone on
every Windows version.
>> 8<---
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 12:03:06 -0600, David Gibbs said:
> I get this error anytime I try to start up WinPT on my XP SP2 system.
> "Sorry, you need a newer GPG version.
> GPG version 1.0.4 requred GPG version 1.2.4"
You probably have an old version of GnuPG somewhere. I suggest to
install the late
Joey Harrison wrote:
>is there any way to use gnupg with online email services like gmail,
>yahoo, and hotmail?
Sure: encrypt and sign the mail locally and paste the result in the
edit window of the webmail provider of your choice.
I don't know if attachments with a hand-set type are possible, o
gmail supports pop so thats one way with the help of a pop3 speaking
email client.
I personally just write my email in my text editor then pipe it
through gpg --clearsign [or -ae] then paste it into the webmail
interface. Sure its not the worlds fastest operation but hey, its <5%
of the time it to
16 matches
Mail list logo
