>From 72d02205e1f25ec0df3a2d7efe44c8990ffead53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Jankuliak
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:01:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add option to not install signal handlers
---
src/include/gnunet_scheduler_lib.h | 16 +
src/util/scheduler.c
7;m assuming it
means that there should be at least one path either direction a message
can hop between the two nodes.
Are these problems with establishing connections something you guys are
aware of? Or am I doing something incorrectly?
Many thanks,
Peter
__
it does appear as if gnunet is
still communicating with other nodes (in both cases, when connected
manually and when one node is a bootstrap server).
Thanks!
Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
GNUnet-developers mailing lis
Hello, what is the git commit from which the 0.10.1 release
was made?
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
bumping
commit 4a5c2f93a3c89526ca24f4711ba3f7b63c360ae2
Date: Tue Apr 8 11:15:34 2014 +
version bumping for 0.10.1
Perhaps the f7aad96 is the one?
On 29/11/17 11:00, ng0 wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> It was the SVN commit that became the git commit
> c0e3537bc400698137b43a78fc63ca96ae6315a9
>
> Date:
link to such document would be greatly appreciated.
Peter
___
GNUnet-developers mailing list
GNUnet-developers@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
l
messages over this interface? What's not possible? Is this still the
right aproach?
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJR1cvcAAoJEHBsXR3UqtsxhqsP/jcd
rhaps some students can explore gnunet more easily with
this :-)
Thanks again
Peter
Am 08.07.2013 18:31, schrieb Christian Grothoff:
> On 07/04/2013 09:24 PM, Peter Schrammel wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> there will be Hackathon in a week where I'd like to lay the
>> basics for
