On Sat, Mar 09, 2024 at 10:30:07AM +0200, em...@msavoritias.me wrote:
> XMPP can work fine through p2p. Its just not being done a lot because of
> other reasons i can expand if needed.
Yes, you can rewrite any protocol radically enough to cook rice
or iron your shirts but then you are really just
Note that a large variety of standard transport protocols that gnunet
runs over is what we need, not (only) the most efficient and newest
protocol that can transport our payload.
Eventually, peers may want to "hide" inside HTTPS, DNS, Bluetooth, WiFi
etc, ideally with traffic that looks like those
On 07.03.24 20:12, carlo von lynX wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 02:15:02PM +, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
This release marks a noteworthy milestone in that it includes a
completely new transport layer.
Congrats!!!
Thx! ;-)
- There are known major design issues in the CORE subsyst
Hi,
Thank you for all your emails. I thought I would do some homework
before replying but I don't have much to contribute to this thread. This
discussion has been quite overwhelming, and I have got a lot to learn.
On Friday, March 8, 2024 12:39:31 AM IST carlo von lynX wrote:
> [...]
> In GNUnet
On Tue, 2024-03-12 at 02:37 +0530, Sahil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for all your emails. I thought I would do some homework
> before replying but I don't have much to contribute to this thread.
> This
> discussion has been quite overwhelming, and I have got a lot to
> learn.
>
> On Friday, March
