On 03/02/2013 05:50 AM, LRN wrote:
> On 02.03.2013 07:34, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>
>> So for me the question is more if we simplify to linear, to trees,
>> keep the current pseudo-tree (tree representing a directed graph)
>> and/or how we make whatever we choose to do _easy_ to understand.
>> I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.03.2013 15:31, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 03/02/2013 05:50 AM, LRN wrote:
>> On 02.03.2013 07:34, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>>
>>> So for me the question is more if we simplify to linear, to
>>> trees, keep the current pseudo-tree (tree rep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.03.2013 16:49, LRN wrote:
> A compromise solution would be to enable hashmap check, but make
> it more sophisticated - take more than just "id" into account.
> Also, when a previously-traversed item is encountered, don't just
> return immediat
On 03/02/2013 01:49 PM, LRN wrote:
> On 02.03.2013 15:31, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> On 03/02/2013 05:50 AM, LRN wrote:
>>> On 02.03.2013 07:34, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>>>
So for me the question is more if we simplify to linear, to
trees, keep the current pseudo-tree (tree represent
On 03/02/2013 02:25 PM, LRN wrote:
> On 02.03.2013 16:49, LRN wrote:
>
>> A compromise solution would be to enable hashmap check, but make
>> it more sophisticated - take more than just "id" into account.
>> Also, when a previously-traversed item is encountered, don't just
>> return immediately
