Why don't you just run a few VMs on your local machine? It's not like a
GNUnet peer requires tons of resources, so a typical system should
easily be able to run several VMs with a GNUnet peer in each. If you
then disable external network connectivity, you're pretty much
guaranteed to only be talkin
You do not need to move those conf files!
The content of those files is the default configuration used by GNUnet
if you have a empty config file. Every configuration option you like to
chance from its default behavior has to be written into the config file
which will overwrite the default be
First I moved to config files to the right place,
then I ran "gnunet-arm -s". So I have to update the
config files to remove the UNIXONLY stuff.
sudo mv ./share/gnunet-secushare/config.d/multicast.conf
/usr/local/share/gnunet/config.d
sudo mv ./share/gnunet-secushare/config.d/psycstore.conf
/usr/l
Hello,
as per the subject, I'm looking for a way to set up a small independent
network of peers to test an application.
What I'm looking for is primarily for this network to exist
independently from the normal global GNUnet network that peers connect
to when using the default configuration.
I do
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 11:39 +0200, carlo von lynX wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:05:06AM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote:
> > The circular topology of end points *does* satisfy the secushare
> > expectations on privacy and metadata privacy in particular AFAICT,
> > so that's very cool.
>
> Whoops
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 11:05:06AM +0200, carlo von lynX wrote:
> The circular topology of end points *does* satisfy the secushare
> expectations on privacy and metadata privacy in particular AFAICT,
> so that's very cool.
Whoopsa I'm posting faster than I am thinking, sorry. No, without
any form
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:29:02AM +0200, TheJackiMonster wrote:
> Because the messenger service was mentioned I thought I could try to
> clarify. I'm unsure if it's the proper back-end for secushare but
> technically speaking you can just think of it as layer on top of CADET
> to form groups using
Because the messenger service was mentioned I thought I could try to
clarify. I'm unsure if it's the proper back-end for secushare but
technically speaking you can just think of it as layer on top of CADET
to form groups using a shared secret without necessary centralization.
The latency and stabi
Tobias, so happy to hear that your hands-on on the matter! Everything
t3sserakt warns about is unfortunately true - after all the effort put
into those subsystems we don't know if they have a chance of delivering
what we need at any happy point in the future. Some additional thoughts
on what t3sser
Hey Tobias,
On 19.09.21 11:08, Tobias Platen wrote:
> I successfully compiled gnunet-secushare, but I got an a runtime error,
> so the next thing that I'll do ist fixing many bugs that occur.
>
> 2021-09-19T10:57:50.884585+0200 gnunet-social-110956 ERROR Assertion
> failed at social_api.c:2682. Ab
10 matches
Mail list logo
