On 12/23/2015 01:34 PM, LRN wrote:
> I'm still not sure how this stands legally (IANAL, by the way) - is there
> such thing as a "shared right to re-license"? I assume you've had some
> legal advice in this regard.
Well, basically some variant of such a shared right to re-license is
what the P=P p
On 23.12.2015 15:10, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 12/23/2015 11:52 AM, LRN wrote:
>> On 23.12.2015 12:09, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>>> I would like to ask all contributors/developers to assign their
>>> copyright on GNUnet code to "GNUnet e.V." (https://gnunet.org/ev)
>>>
>>> The reason is that
On 12/23/2015 11:52 AM, LRN wrote:
> On 23.12.2015 12:09, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>> I would like to ask all contributors/developers to assign their
>> copyright on GNUnet code to "GNUnet e.V." (https://gnunet.org/ev)
>>
>> The reason is that situations continue to pop up where the ability to
>>
On 23.12.2015 12:09, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> I would like to ask all contributors/developers to assign their
> copyright on GNUnet code to "GNUnet e.V." (https://gnunet.org/ev)
>
> The reason is that situations continue to pop up where the ability to
> dual-license some code would be helpful f
Dear all,
I have an important request, so please read this if you are (or were) a
GNUnet developer.
I would like to ask all contributors/developers to assign their
copyright on GNUnet code to "GNUnet e.V." (https://gnunet.org/ev)
The reason is that situations continue to pop up where the ability
