Use testbed, it's almost always superior for higher-level testing
(anything above core/transport). -Christian
On 09/28/2015 04:49 PM, tg (x) wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:59:56 +0200, Christian Grothoff
>> said:
>
>> Great! Have you tried running the test with --enable-coverage and
> On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 10:59:56 +0200, Christian Grothoff
> said:
> Great! Have you tried running the test with --enable-coverage and
> analyzing the output with lcov to see how well the tests cover the code?
Yes, I checked, it covers it fairly well, the lacking part is the CADET
functi
Great! Have you tried running the test with --enable-coverage and
analyzing the output with lcov to see how well the tests cover the code?
I don't care too much about the percentage, but it would be good to be
sure that there are not some significant parts of the algorithm that are
left untested b
