On 11/30/2012 05:26 AM, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.11.2012 4:04, Christian Grothoff wrote:
On 11/29/2012 10:04 PM, LRN wrote:
On 29.11.2012 22:53, Christian Grothoff wrote:
2) Transport disguise. Modify the protocol to allow clients
to ignore initial data s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.11.2012 4:04, Christian Grothoff wrote:
> On 11/29/2012 10:04 PM, LRN wrote:
>> On 29.11.2012 22:53, Christian Grothoff wrote:
2) Transport disguise. Modify the protocol to allow clients
to ignore initial data sent by the server, and re
On 11/29/2012 10:04 PM, LRN wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29.11.2012 22:53, Christian Grothoff wrote:
2) Transport disguise. Modify the protocol to allow clients to
ignore initial data sent by the server, and require clients to be
the first ones to speak GNUnet protoco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29.11.2012 22:53, Christian Grothoff wrote:
>>
>> 2) Transport disguise. Modify the protocol to allow clients to
>> ignore initial data sent by the server, and require clients to be
>> the first ones to speak GNUnet protocol after connecting (i'm n
Sorry, on re-read I noticed you want to use the *private* key to generate
A. Forgeddaboutit.
This just raises another risk: you're making public extra info related
somehow to your private key, which if you're not extra careful can be a big
fail.
Bart Polot
On 29 November 2012 20:14, Bart Polot
Another problem I see is: if you are using K as a seed to generate a
consistent set A, it could be possible to just collect a large set of
HELLOs "B" and see if any Ki in B generates a large subset of B. Then the
Ki must be real and all the generated HELLOs, fake, and you are busted.
Bart Polot
On 11/29/2012 07:26 PM, Bart Polot wrote:
These are my thoughts on the matter, especially point 1:
- The spreading of false info is leads to quite some inefficiency for
the network in general.
- Even if you spread X false adresses for you, "they" can always issue
X+1 search orders/legal procedure
These are my thoughts on the matter, especially point 1:
- The spreading of false info is leads to quite some inefficiency for the
network in general.
- Even if you spread X false adresses for you, "they" can always issue X+1
search orders/legal procedures and catch you.
- If you are worried about
