I also noticed that after returning to release 2.6.18-3 the main text font
used in the body of the register windows appears to be a couple of points
larger than before, so dates and amounts no longer fit in the columns
nicely like before the experiment, and less text is visible in the
description c
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 10:00 PM, David Carlson
> wrote:
>
> Also, I think it is known that release 2.7.3 is unable to install F::Q, even
> via the manual program link in the GnuCash program group of the Windows 7
> start menu.
If I knew that I'd forgotten. The new build scripts missed copyi
I can’t time report loading on my macs in 2.7.3 — gnucash crashes whenever I
try to create a report. No problems or slowdowns with 2.6.19
--
Dave Reiser
dbrei...@icloud.com
> On Jan 27, 2018, at 11:39 AM, R. Victor Klassen wrote:
>
> This is quite dramatic. Probably my favourite thing to d
This is quite dramatic. Probably my favourite thing to do in code is to make
it faster. (Un)fortunately I don’t run Windows, so I have little to offer
here. The sudden and dramatic change raises the question of what changed?
And I haven’t noticed this issue on the Mac, so I’m guessing the c
Here are the times to fully open my data file on my Windows 7 laptop.
2.6.18 to open 6,480 KB compressed XML file on C: drive
3:14:21
2.6.16 to open 82,605 KB uncompressed XML file on C: drive
3:06:97
2.6.18 to open 6,480 KB compressed XML file on LAN mapped to U: 3:54:00
2.7.3 to open 6,484 KB
David,
Maybe just to rule it out as an issue you could temporarily put it on a local
drive.
How big is it? It's XML, right? See if turning compression on or off makes a
difference.
Regards,
John Ralls
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 3:15 PM, David Carlson
> wrote:
>
> I failed to mention that my da
I failed to mention that my data file is not on my "C" drive, it is on a
LAN file-server, but the entire path is via 100 MHz Ethernet, no Wi-Fi.
David C
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:45 PM, David Carlson
wrote:
> Preliminary results comparing release 2.6.18-3 with 2.7.3 on a Dell
> Precision 7510 l
Thanks for the first test David.
Ugh, that's actually even much worse :(
Let's hope we find some time to check what's going on there.
Geert
Op donderdag 25 januari 2018 21:45:22 CET schreef David Carlson:
> Preliminary results comparing release 2.6.18-3 with 2.7.3 on a Dell
> Precision 7510 lap
Preliminary results comparing release 2.6.18-3 with 2.7.3 on a Dell
Precision 7510 laptop running Windows 7 sp1 64 bit with a Intel(R) Core(TM)
i7-6820HQ CPU @2.70Ghz and 24.0 GB installed RAM and all updates installed
except a recent Dell display driver update and the Spectre patch update is
not i
Op donderdag 25 januari 2018 17:17:48 CET schreef David Carlson:
> About not seeing Geert's message in the Gmail instance in Firefox on my
> laptop, on that machine gmail put it into spam because it did not meet
> their lofty standards for authentication. On the Gmail app on my Samsung
> phone, it
About not seeing Geert's message in the Gmail instance in Firefox on my
laptop, on that machine gmail put it into spam because it did not meet
their lofty standards for authentication. On the Gmail app on my Samsung
phone, it was in the Inbox. Most of Geert's other messages this morning
went to m
Hi All,
I am in the process of downloading 2.7.3 and preparing a test file to see
if that release is improved. I cannot see the email asking for that here
in this instance of Gmail on my real laptop, but I am sure there was one.
On a related note I have a question about splash screen behavior.
This is happening on Window7 64bit too. I didn't have this issue until I
installed 2.6.19. Now even the simplest report of summing up an expense
report of less than 50 entries takes a couple of minutes to appear with the
"GnuCash is not responding" error message.
--
Sent from: http://gnucash.14
Op woensdag 24 januari 2018 08:54:03 CET schreef David T. via gnucash-user:
> Yes.
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790789
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:37, David Carlson
> wrote: OK, I missed the reference. Has a bug been submitted?
>
> David C
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018
Yes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790789
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:37, David Carlson
wrote: OK, I missed the reference. Has a bug been submitted?
David C
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:32 AM, David T. wrote:
David,
Christopher is referring to a thread in which windows us
OK, I missed the reference. Has a bug been submitted?
David C
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:32 AM, David T. wrote:
> David,
>
> Christopher is referring to a thread in which windows users reported that
> gnucash was imposing a substantial delay on the first run report. This is
> different from th
David,
Christopher is referring to a thread in which windows users reported that
gnucash was imposing a substantial delay on the first run report. This is
different from the general problem of slow report loading, I believe.
As for the delay, I have not seen anyone say that they have a fix.
D
There has been a long standing problem with reports that need to process a
lot of records being slow to open for most every release in the 2.6 series
in Windows, if I recall. However, if release 2.6.19 is now slow even with
simple reports, that is a new issue. I think that the upcoming 3.0 series
Like Ron Burek (7 Jan 2018) I am running Gnucash 2.6.19 on Windows 10 pro,
fully updated.
When you try to open any report, transaction report, profit & loss etc, Gnucash
goes into a long time wait mode with the blank report tab open, typically about
3 or 4 minutes, before the report actually ope
19 matches
Mail list logo