Hi,
Adonay Felipe Nogueira writes:
> I wonder what exactly made it hard to maintian at our side... Was there
> some customization you wanted to do? Or some bug you wanted to fix?
I honestly don't recall the issue. The package was removed from
RH/Fedora which made it more challenging. Also, we
Indeed, I'm sorry about that.
I got carried away by Groups.io and Nabble. Now at least we know the
various options and possible advantages or disadvantages.
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/ma
Adonay,
While I appreciate your fervor for open source, I think this thread has
gone well past appropriate for the gnucash list.
Thanks,
-derek
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse any typos.
___
gnucash-user mailing list
gnucash-user@gnuc
> I am not using any special software to access; just my browser.
That's the problem, website owners trick browsers into downloading and
using software automatically. You can take a proof of this by making a
simple .html document/page yourself, like so:
# Begin of file
JavaScript
any gnucash
developer requested of them, and indeed the gnucash developers have no
visibility into it.
There are a bunch of users that use nabble -- their messages get forwarded
to the mailing list and, if they are not subscribed, get moderated before
being sent through.
Regardless, nabble, l
Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote
> It's the first time I'm hearing about Nabble, but it seems that it
> requires the website visitor to use non-free software.
Gnucash is using Nabble now. Besides the link I posted earlier, the
GnuCash wiki notes it on http://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists.
I
It's the first time I'm hearing about Nabble, but it seems that it
requires the website visitor to use non-free software.
The page you linked has the following non-free software:
- [[/util/jquery-1.7.2.pack.js]].
- This one might be non-free. This depends on whether "the license
specified
Plutocrat wrote
> most obviously the difficulty of searching them (resulting in repeat user
> questions), and the lack of choice between a web interface and plain
> email.
Why not use Nabble? (http://gnucash.1415818.n4.nabble.com) N.B.: I am not a
shill for Nabble -- I have just found it handy
t;>
>>>> On May 11, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It looks like groups.io is a hosted platform, not a package we could
>>>> install and run ourselves.
>>>>
>>>> I'm still waiting for mailman3.
>&
y 11, 2017 1:28 pm, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
>>
>>> On May 11, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>>
>>> It looks like groups.io is a hosted platform, not a package we could
>>> install and run ourselves.
>>>
>>> I'm still wai
Hi,
On Thu, May 11, 2017 1:28 pm, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
>
>> On May 11, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>> It looks like groups.io is a hosted platform, not a package we could
>> install and run ourselves.
>>
>> I'm still waiting for m
> On May 11, 2017, at 6:31 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> It looks like groups.io is a hosted platform, not a package we could install
> and run ourselves.
>
> I'm still waiting for mailman3.
>
> As for searching that's a separate issue and can be sol
I wonder what exactly made it hard to maintian at our side... Was there
some customization you wanted to do? Or some bug you wanted to fix?
Perhaps other Namazu server software operators can join up to share
fixes and improvements, and perhaps even continue the Namazu project.
Also worth suggesti
Hi,
We *WERE* using Namazu.. But then it got dropped by RH/Fedora back around
Fedora 12.. making it hard to maintain. i tried for a while, but then it
just got too hard to keep up. Last I checked (which, granted, was about 5
years ago) the project had pretty much stopped evolving.
-derek
On
I think that Namazu would be a good *complement* that allows this
current mailing list to be searched for.
A lot of mailing lists at GNU.org and LibrePlanet.org are using it.
I don't know how to install it, but I do use it in some mailing lists
from time to time.
Namazu is registered in the Free
It looks like groups.io is a hosted platform, not a package we could install
and run ourselves.
I'm still waiting for mailman3.
As for searching that's a separate issue and can be solved piecemeal.
Indeed, we could potentially even add a framed google search if someone wants
On Thu, 11 May 2017 13:18:30 +0800
Plutocrat wrote:
> So excuse me for bringing up the issue of alternative mailing list
> software again, but I only just became aware of groups.io, and my
> initial impression is favorable.
>
> As has been noted before there are a number of shor
So excuse me for bringing up the issue of alternative mailing list software
again, but I only just became aware of groups.io, and my initial impression is
favorable.
As has been noted before there are a number of shortcomings of the current
mailing list format, most obviously the difficulty
18 matches
Mail list logo
