Re: [GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs

2020-04-29 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
David, I was not talking from URLs in comments, but the URL field in the header of the bugzilla form. That would be much faster found in longer reports. Stay healthy Frank Am 28.04.20 um 09:19 schrieb D.: > Frank, > > I don't understand; comment number 2 on > https://bugs.gnucash.org/show_bug

Re: [GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs

2020-04-28 Thread D. via gnucash-user
" Cc: Gnucash Users Subject: Re: [GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs David, Am 28.04.20 um 04:20 schrieb D.: > Frank, > > This is an interesting, but misleading point in this case, given that this > request has been around since at least 2008 in bug form (b

Re: [GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs

2020-04-27 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
David, Am 28.04.20 um 04:20 schrieb D.: > Frank, > > This is an interesting, but misleading point in this case, given that this > request has been around since at least 2008 in bug form (bug 527432 seems to > be the earliest, although it is marked a duplicate of a different yet still > open b

Re: [GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs

2020-04-27 Thread D. via gnucash-user
20 To: "D." , stepbystepf...@comcast.net Cc: Gnucash Users Subject: [GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs Hi David et.al. Am 27.04.20 um 18:47 schrieb D. via gnucash-user: > It's too bad the RFE had never been taken up. It doesn't seem like it would >

[GNC] Volunteers for a triage teem; was: Gnucash logs

2020-04-27 Thread Frank H. Ellenberger
Hi David et.al. Am 27.04.20 um 18:47 schrieb D. via gnucash-user: > It's too bad the RFE had never been taken up. It doesn't seem like it would > be that insurmountable to achieve. the problem is, our current core team, which is watching bugs.gnucash.org, is too small to watch also uservoice. C