Adrien Monteleone writes:
> I understood that already, but thanks for the detail.
>
> What doesn’t work is sorting off the part, because the sorting
> stops at “.”, correct?
Correct.
> That’s why you can’t use “:” in the faux timestamp as the sorting will
> stop before it gets to the minut
I understood that already, but thanks for the detail.
What doesn’t work is sorting off the part, because the sorting stops at
“.”, correct?
That’s why you can’t use “:” in the faux timestamp as the sorting will stop
before it gets to the minutes portion, and why you have to use a 24 hour
Adrien,
On Fri, March 8, 2019 2:41 pm, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> I didn’t mean to still be able to sort by the real transaction number, but
> if you have one, and you’ve repurposed the NUM field, you’ll likely want a
> place to put it just for reference. I simply offered an overview of the
> rema
I didn’t mean to still be able to sort by the real transaction number, but if
you have one, and you’ve repurposed the NUM field, you’ll likely want a place
to put it just for reference. I simply offered an overview of the remaining
options. Overloading NUM as a time field is pretty much giving u
Adrien Monteleone writes:
> Yes, that is why I was explaining the abuse of the NUM field as a time
> field for sorting and how to do it in a way that works. If you are
> doing this, (or instead using 1,2,3,4 ) *and* you want to keep track
> of a transaction number, then you’ll have to put it some
On 3/7/19 8:57 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Adrien Monteleone writes:
>
>> Lisa,
>>
>> I will add to David’s advice that you can use the NUM field other than
>> a simple 1,2,3,4...
>>
>> You might, for example, need or want to keep an actual transaction
>> number with the transaction.
>>
>> For that
Yes, that is why I was explaining the abuse of the NUM field as a time field
for sorting and how to do it in a way that works. If you are doing this, (or
instead using 1,2,3,4 ) *and* you want to keep track of a transaction number,
then you’ll have to put it somewhere else so you can still sort
Adrien Monteleone writes:
> Lisa,
>
> I will add to David’s advice that you can use the NUM field other than
> a simple 1,2,3,4...
>
> You might, for example, need or want to keep an actual transaction
> number with the transaction.
>
> For that case, you can put the real transaction number in th
Lisa,
I will add to David’s advice that you can use the NUM field other than a simple
1,2,3,4...
You might, for example, need or want to keep an actual transaction number with
the transaction.
For that case, you can put the real transaction number in the Action or Memo
field of the split.
Ot
Lisa
In the register display for an account you will see a field Num. You can
specify a number for each transaction which will determine the order in
which the transactions are displayed.This however affects all registers in
which the transaction appears as per the second reference below. It is
r
Hi,
I just started using GnuCash, and am still trying to figure out all the
tips and trick of how to use this. I am coming from Quicken, and one of the
things that I was able to do in there that I can't seem to figure out in
GnuCash is choosing the order that the transactions are posting. For
exam
Yes David, I am sure my bank manager is going to provide me a detailed
report, but it is fun to have all details under control :-D
In fact, it is not so complicated, I only miss the possibility to move the
order of transactions of one account manually. Perhaps one solution (that I
think it is quit
Wow!
That would be very messy to track in GnuCash and even a challenge in a
simple spreadsheet.
Do you have some other software designed to address this scenario? Can the
fund manager give you a detailed report ?
David C
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 1:28 PM Christian Pinedo Zamalloa <
chr.pin...@gmai
Hello,
in our case, the capital/gain losses are delayed in fund transfers and only
considered when the share is sold. I would try to put a clearer example:
Fund A account
1, 2010-1-1, buy 10 shares @ 10 €, gross/net buy 100 €
2, 2015-1-1, transfer 10 shares @ 9 € to fund B, gross sell 90€ with 10
If funds were used to buy a different security first then that security was
sold for a withdrawal and intermediate gains matter unlike in U.S.
custodial accounts, it could get very messy.
David C
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:43 AM D wrote:
> If OP is looking to track gains using FIFO, wouldn't the
If OP is looking to track gains using FIFO, wouldn't the lots functionality
work for them? I believe that it uses FIFO exclusively...
David T.
On November 14, 2018, at 8:23 PM, David Carlson
wrote:
I think that Christian is asking a slightly different question. I
interpret it that in one par
I think that Christian is asking a slightly different question. I
interpret it that in one parent custodial mutual fund account he purchased
Fund A on dates 1, 2 and later then sold some or all of Fund A and bought
Fund B in the same custodial account on date 3.
Now I am not sure if he needs to a
As you suggest, I am following the method 1 because I didn't know another
solution. I didn't realise of the second approach but I consider the first
option is more easy to implement.
When I sell shares, I must select manually transactions to track capital
gain/losses because the order of the trans
Hi,
On Wed, November 14, 2018 8:42 am, Christian Pinedo Zamalloa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if it is possible to order manually the transactions
> of a mutual fund account.
>
> When I transfer suscriptions from one mutual fund to another one, the
> order
> of the transfer transaction
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to order manually the transactions
of a mutual fund account.
When I transfer suscriptions from one mutual fund to another one, the order
of the transfer transaction depends on the date when the transfer was done.
However, it would be quite useful to
20 matches
Mail list logo
