On 2019-06-16 15:12, Maf. King wrote:
> On Sunday, 16 June 2019 23:06:34 BST Adrien Monteleone wrote:
>> I think I might be understanding #2 more. The list is passing on your
>> message, and it looks like it is routing through gnucash.org instead of
>> directly from you. (which technically is true)
On Sunday, 16 June 2019 23:06:34 BST Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> I think I might be understanding #2 more. The list is passing on your
> message, and it looks like it is routing through gnucash.org instead of
> directly from you. (which technically is true)
>
> In that case, I suppose yes, you coul
I think I might be understanding #2 more. The list is passing on your message,
and it looks like it is routing through gnucash.org instead of directly from
you. (which technically is true)
In that case, I suppose yes, you could configure gnucash.org as a whitelisted
sender if just to eliminate
On Sunday, 16 June 2019 22:38:46 BST Adrien Monteleone wrote:
> I don’t see how #2 would solve anything as gnucash.org isn’t sending mail
> through your domain. You can request DKIM checks as part of an incoming
> spam filter, but that wouldn’t have anything to do with your settings for
> outgoing
I don’t see how #2 would solve anything as gnucash.org isn’t sending mail
through your domain. You can request DKIM checks as part of an incoming spam
filter, but that wouldn’t have anything to do with your settings for outgoing
mail.
I wouldn’t do #1, or #3.
If the message is making through t
This is one for mailman gurus...
I've recently got around to adding DKIM and DMARC to the domain I use for
sending email to this list.
I just got a couple of DMARC failure reports, following a message I sent to
the list, for reasons which I mostly understand about the changes the list
makes t
