>> BTW)
> >>> Gnucash has always allowed users to put transactions in intermediate
> >> level
> >>> accounts, which some in the community have felt was Not Good, although
> >> I've
> >>> been a little more equivocal about it. I'm not sur
tion and level setting in the various reports that use that method
of
grouping, and then update the docs with information.
Best,
David T.
Original Message --------
From: Geoff
Sent: Fri Feb 19 18:37:21 EST 2021
To: gnu Gord , gnucash-user@gnucash.org
Subject: Re: [GNC] Expense Ove
think Gord's final question is an interesting one. It might be
> > > useful to conduct some tests to see the interaction between account
> > > selection and level setting in the various reports that use that method
> > of
> > > grouping, and then update the docs w
ng in the various reports that use that method
of
grouping, and then update the docs with information.
Best,
David T.
Original Message --------
From: Geoff
Sent: Fri Feb 19 18:37:21 EST 2021
To: gnu Gord , gnucash-user@gnucash.org
Subject: Re: [GNC] Expense Over Time report
Hi Go
ports that use that method
> of
> > grouping, and then update the docs with information.
> >
> > Best,
> > David T.
> >
> >
> >
> > Original Message
> > From: Geoff
> > Sent: Fri Feb 19 18:37:21 EST 2021
> > To:
hod of
> grouping, and then update the docs with information.
>
> Best,
> David T.
>
>
>
> Original Message
> From: Geoff
> Sent: Fri Feb 19 18:37:21 EST 2021
> To: gnu Gord , gnucash-user@gnucash.org
> Subject: Re: [GNC] Expense Over Time
That was an excellent answer, and explains clearly a big reason why users
should strive to limit their transactions to leaf nodes in the account
hierarchy. (My own books include numerous violations of this premise, BTW)
Gnucash has always allowed users to put transactions in intermediate leve
Gord , gnucash-user@gnucash.org
Subject: Re: [GNC] Expense Over Time report
Hi Gord
It appears that L3 is both a parent of L4 and has transactions worth
$100 itself.
Thus reporting on L3 is ambiguous - do you want only its transactions
($100), or its transactions plus the sum of its childr
Hi Gord
It appears that L3 is both a parent of L4 and has transactions worth
$100 itself.
Thus reporting on L3 is ambiguous - do you want only its transactions
($100), or its transactions plus the sum of its children ($100 + $500 =
$600)?
I suggest that you only record transactions against
I'm trying to understand this report and it just isn't working the way I
expect.
Below is a screenshot of my test chart of accounts, for reference.
I have one expense of $100 in account L3 and one expense of $500 in account
L4
If I ask for an Expense Over Time report and select L3 and* "Show Accou
10 matches
Mail list logo
