Re: [GNC] Account remains red after void that would put it in black

2019-05-01 Thread Jean-David Beyer via gnucash-user
On 5/1/19 9:34 PM, D via gnucash-user wrote: > I never knew that zero was negative number! In IBM computers of the 704, 709, 7090, 7094 line, the numbers were in sign-magnitude form, different from the two's complement form in common use today. So there were both Positive zero ane Negative zero on

Re: [GNC] Account remains red after void that would put it in black

2019-05-01 Thread Adrien Monteleone
Have you tested the following: Delete the transaction instead of using the `Void Transaction` function? Add a reversing transaction either manually? or using the `Add Reversing Transaction` function? Curious to see if this discrepancy holds against all workflows. Regards, Adrien > On May 1,

Re: [GNC] Account remains red after void that would put it in black

2019-05-01 Thread Adrien Monteleone
I’ve seen zero as a negative (or red) number before with other applications. (notably, OOo/LO Calc) It usually results from a rounding situation where the color is set before the rounding down to zero. So the real amount was a negative closer to zero than `-1`. It is fixable, but would require

Re: [GNC] Account remains red after void that would put it in black

2019-05-01 Thread D via gnucash-user
Jeff, Assuming that you're referring to the figures in the reconciliation window, I have noticed that issue as well. It seems that once they are displayed as red, the color setting is never revisited. I just ignored it, knowing that the color was wrong; since a red zero (I never knew that ze

[GNC] Account remains red after void that would put it in black

2019-05-01 Thread Jeff Albrecht
Is this a know bug? and/or could someone forward it to gnucash-devel if appropriate? Windows 10 GNUCash version Version: 3.5 Build ID: 3.5+(2019-03-30) I'm balancing a checking account. It has a positive amount for Present and Future in black. I don't specifically remember the Balance column.