On 2 August 2017 at 02:24, John Griessen wrote:
> I have not been able to upgrade gnucash for a while now.
>
> Will there be a usable gnucash in the next debian release?
> If not, why not?
You would probably have to direct that question to whoever packages it
for Debian. If you want the latest t
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 2:10 AM, AC wrote:
>
> On 2017-08-01 08:30, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> The date range is selected on the general tab of report options. You'll find
>> a convenient button in the report toolbar for opening that dialog.
>>
>> 1899 is a weird value. Have you set an accounting pe
Is that the new package of release 2.6.17 from getdeb that I just tried to
download into Ubuntu and have not had time to test yet?
David C
On Aug 1, 2017 8:25 PM, "John Griessen" wrote:
> I have not been able to upgrade gnucash for a while now.
>
> Will there be a usable gnucash in the next de
I have not been able to upgrade gnucash for a while now.
Will there be a usable gnucash in the next debian release?
If not, why not?
I still use this version on debian stretch/testing/frozen, soon to be the new
released debian stable:
sudo apt-get purge gnucash-docs gnucash-common gnucash
sud
On 2017-08-01 08:30, John Ralls wrote:
> The date range is selected on the general tab of report options. You'll find
> a convenient button in the report toolbar for opening that dialog.
>
> 1899 is a weird value. Have you set an accounting period?
>
>
Windows uses 1/1/1900 as the first second
On 2 August 2017 at 04:07, John Ralls wrote:
>
> > On Aug 1, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Christine Maloney
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi john
> > I am sorry but I am not sure how to reply to all it does not seem to work
> > with outlook.
> > Yes I have changed the date on my reports but it still goes to 1899. It
>
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 6:07 PM, Christine Maloney wrote:
>
> Hi john
> I am sorry but I am not sure how to reply to all it does not seem to work
> with outlook.
> Yes I have changed the date on my reports but it still goes to 1899. It is
> either a bug or I have a corrupt copy or something else I
As far as I am aware, there shouldn't be any licensing issues on the FOSS
side about including a government-granted key in the distribution. There
are severe technical issues, which may impact licensing, in keeping the
government-granted key a secret. Since the last bit is the important part,
as fa
Just to make usre that I'm clear: My last message about keeping *my*
mouth closed was a way to tell that *I* won't comment on that for now
because I'd still have to study and gather proof. That is: That message
was not meant to be harsh towards someone.
I hope this helps. :)
__
> On Aug 1, 2017, at 2:02 PM, Christine Maloney wrote:
>
> Hi john
> Not at all the date is year 1899. Do you know how I can populate the
> columns?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Ralls [mailto:jra...@ceridwen.us]
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 5:17 AM
> To: Christine Maloney
>
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 11:19:23AM -0300, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote:
> I don't know if there's a licensing issue or not in regards to having a
> file include/inclusion with such key, so I'll just keep my mouth closed
> for now on that matter. :)
I am sure that many will not be so coy and keep t
Also, depending on how this VAT process is implemented, GnuCash could
make use of some Guile/Scheme modules to do the process of filling the
form, and downloading the PDF.
However, I'm not from the UK, so I don't know exactly where to go to in
order to do so. But, if I'm given a URL/location, I ca
I don't know if there's a licensing issue or not in regards to having a
file include/inclusion with such key, so I'll just keep my mouth closed
for now on that matter. :)
Perhaps, though, instead of requiring a file include/inclusion that
would theoretically have the key, perhaps one could make th
On Tuesday, 1 August 2017 11:24:19 BST Alain Williams wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, who wants MTD?
>
> I don't. It will involve me in a lot of extra work that adds nothing to my
> business.
>
> I am happy with doing VAT on-line -- just login to HMRC web site, enter a
> few numbers into a web page
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:13:48PM -0500, GWB wrote:
> But who knows. I'm averse to having information stored in a digital
> format on government servers because it will eventually be hacked,
> stolen, or otherwise used for something other than the original and
> limited intention (you can pick y
On 31 July 2017 at 13:55, Derek Atkins said:
> Mike,
>
> mike.m...@gmx.net writes:
>
> >[If you don't mind me saying this: I haven't seen mailman lists for
> >quite some years and I was a little surprised to see they still
> >exist. I could not find any way how to add another comment
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 9:44 PM, David Carlson
> wrote:
>
> My home Wi-Fi has suddenly developed a bad case of dropouts in spite of a
> very strong signal. Several times a day various devices need to reconnect.
>
> With that background, if GnuCash is in the process of saving the data file
> (ov
> On Jul 31, 2017, at 9:44 PM, David Carlson
> wrote:
>
> My home Wi-Fi has suddenly developed a bad case of dropouts in spite of a
> very strong signal. Several times a day various devices need to reconnect.
>
> With that background, if GnuCash is in the process of saving the data file
> (ov
18 matches
Mail list logo
