On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:44:58AM +1000, Phillip J Shelton wrote:
> This week I will start re-organising the gnumeric functions into better
> function class groupings.
>
> Is there anyone who I will need to talk to about with respect to either code
> updates they have or the financial library?
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 09:14:12PM -0500, James R. Van Zandt wrote:
>
> I would much prefer that both compatible and correct versions be
> implemented.
There are two distinct questions.
1) replicate poor function interfaces
2) replicate calculation errors
The former is a partial requirem
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:26:38AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Phillip J Shelton writes:
> > I don't intend to un-Excel clone gnumeric. If the spreadsheet functions
> > need errors coded in then that is what has to happen.
>
> Then I will neither use nor recommend gnumeric. I have no objection
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:08:56AM -0500, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 11:30:35AM +0200, Christian Stimming was heard to remark:
> > >So, I've been looking into the gnome-office-graphing [GOG] stuff, and
> > >noticed that it doesn't have a feature of guppi we were using, which is
On Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 10:55:51PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
>
> Can you say "unchecked mallocs"? I would say at very least that you
> need to check the trans at the beginning of xaccInitTransaction:
>
> if (!trans) return;
>
> This is to say nothing about calls to strdup.
One of the tec
