Stephen this bug is in 3.4 and was fixed in commit 95bee405c
Could you try "git revert e31f4c3f9" as a test for your "31/12/70"
test-transaction errors?
On 24/1/19 3:05 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
Found this patch on the debian version for 3.4
Origin: upstream, https://bugs.gnucash.org/atta
Perhaps you can beta-test the budget-barchart, with the report start/end
dates options removed.
This also includes chartJS preview ;-)
https://github.com/christopherlam/gnucash/tree/maint-chartjs-budget-barchart
On 24/1/19 1:42 am, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
Good question — I think the budget r
I haven’t built from git yet. (no time like the present) Do I build the entire
branch or can I just dl and build the report?
Regards,
Adrien
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 5:09 AM, Christopher Lam
> wrote:
>
> Perhaps you can beta-test the budget-barchart, with the report start/end
> dates options re
Best build entire branch because of new chartjs dependencies
On 24/1/19 7:35 pm, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
I haven’t built from git yet. (no time like the present) Do I build the entire
branch or can I just dl and build the report?
Regards,
Adrien
On Jan 24, 2019, at 5:09 AM, Christopher Lam
I see looking deeper there is a budget-barchart.scm.
Can I just grab that and add it as a custom report? or do I still need to build
something (or everything) from your branch?
Sorry for the noob git questions.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Adrien Monteleone
> wrote:
>
> I
Okay, disregard other message that just crossed this one.
Regards,
Adrien
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 5:43 AM, Christopher Lam
> wrote:
>
> Best build entire branch because of new chartjs dependencies
>
> On 24/1/19 7:35 pm, Adrien Monteleone wrote:
>> I haven’t built from git yet. (no time like th
Geert Janssens writes:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I see the missing icon as well. It should be a large version of our bugzilla-
> gnucash logo IMO.
Hmm, the page source has an empty data in there. There's no tag,
so it's not that the graphic is missing, it's just not configured.
I'm not sure where this is
That is working well for me (on a virgin 18.10 system).
Excellent work.
Colin
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:15, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>
> On 1/23/19 12:55 PM, Colin Law wrote:
> > Steve, are you sure it is worth all this effort? If the flatpak
> > nightly and stable builds become available then
On 22/01/2019 15:16, John Ralls wrote:
Wm,
F::Q has had a commit to add 6 seconds between requests in its git repo for
almost a year, but the maintainer hasn’t been able to make time to do a new
release. This has been discussed several times on the user list.
Naughty F::Q ... don't be silly
On 1/24/19 8:21 AM, Colin Law wrote:
> That is working well for me (on a virgin 18.10 system).
>
> Excellent work.
>
> Colin
Thanks Colin and everyone else for your pointers and help along the way.
>
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 23:15, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
>> On 1/23/19 12:55 PM, Colin Law wrot
On 1/24/19 2:32 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Stephen this bug is in 3.4 and was fixed in commit 95bee405c
>
> Could you try "git revert e31f4c3f9" as a test for your "31/12/70"
> test-transaction errors?
That worked. Thank you. BTW, how did you find that it was fixed? I
ask, because there is a
Because e31f4c3f9 is causing errors on my build as well in different ways.
PS e31f4c3f9 must not be reverted for your packaging - please be patient
while a proper fix is pending.
On 25/1/19 3:48 am, Stephen M. Butler wrote:
On 1/24/19 2:32 AM, Christopher Lam wrote:
Stephen this bug is in 3.
OH! Light bulb on!
OK. I understand what you said earlier. I'll put the patches back into
the packaging.
Thanks for clearing that up.
--Steve
PS Looking in manual for 'revert' command.
On 1/24/19 1:06 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Because e31f4c3f9 is causing errors on my build as well in d
Revert is a git terminology, not a gnucash one. Welcome to version control.
Please remember this revert is reverting a buggy code with a previous buggy
code, so, cannot be consisted safe to package; best wait until the clever
devs can find a proper fix for gnc-date.
On Fri., 25 Jan. 2019, 05:46 S
On 1/24/19 7:36 PM, Christopher Lam wrote:
> Revert is a git terminology, not a gnucash one. Welcome to version
> control.
That's the manual to which I referred. It meant something else to my
mind when I first saw your post. But, after further thought, my
previous thought was faulty.
My first
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Wm
> To: gnucash-de...@lists.gnucash.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:37:30 +
> Subject: Re: [GNC-dev] Alphavantage strategies
> On 22/01/2019 15:16, John Ralls wrote:
>
> > Wm,
> >
> > F::Q has had a commit to add 6 seconds between
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 8:02 PM, Alex Aycinena wrote:
>
> Are you off your meds again?
>
> I suggest anyone responding to his emails, including myself, is off his
> meds as well.
Or on the self-prescribed sort.
Regards,
John Ralls
___
gnucash-deve
17 matches
Mail list logo
