Hi,
In addition to the message below, after investigating and testing the import
business data functionality, reading the code, and registering a number of
bugs, I decided to try and fix the bugs myself.
So I assigned the bugs to myself, and have started fixing them locally. I have
also started
I think one of the developers here mentioned that there is a lot of
duplication in the reports arena. I concur. At first it was very
confusing as to which was the "correct" one. Finally figured out none
where -- according to the in house SME (pronounced "smee" and standing
for Subject Matter Exp
Geert,
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 9:17 AM Alex Aycinena
wrote:
> Geert,
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 8:11 AM Geert Janssens
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, January 6, 2019 4:55:09 AM CET Alex Aycinena wrote:
>> > Geert,
>> >
>> > I have been investigating bug # 796687 (Tax Entity name and type for an
>> > a
Stephen,
I'm sure I would welcome improvement in the reports.
I don't have many concrete points here, except to suggest that the ideal UI
point for a reconciliation report would be at the end of the reconciliation
process. A check box on the reconcile window would trigger the report,
automatic
Stephen, while I agree in principle that the reports need cleanup, as a user, I
don’t want to see functionality removed, just moved. Consider the following:
For example on your #1,
Why do I need to see the credit split for every transaction when running the
report for an expense account? Maybe
