Re: [GNC-dev] Python: About Wrapping SWIG Objects (GncNumeric)

Christoph Holtermann wrote > I'm willing to now and then do something for the python bindings. I > don't feel like an expert. But surely I'd like to talk and think things > through > about them. Maybe someone is interested. I saw that there were some people > asking questions about the bindings

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 20:50:38 CEST schreef Geert Janssens: > Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 17:49:57 CEST schreef Adrien Monteleone: > > but is there a list of ’needs’ of the > > developers to use when evaluating methods? > > I don't think it's ever been formally written down. But here is a fi

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 21:24:25 CEST schreef John Ralls: > > On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote: - it should allow multiple output formats. A few the come to mind: > > html, pdf, epub, mobi, windows compressed help, xml for yelp,... > > We don't need a single tool to do t

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 21:36:58 CEST schreef John Ralls: > > On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote: > > Aside from that they also expect there writers to work with git. > > Version control is an obvious hard requirement. I don't know if it > completely fulfills your "managea

[GNC-dev] Bug 796778 Patch

Hi, I have attached a patch file with changes to gnucash/import-export/import-main-matcher.c and gnucash/gtkbuilder/dialog-import.glade for adding multiple selection capability to the import-matcher with the ability to assign a single transfer account to the selected transactions to the Bug

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

Geert Janssens writes: [snip] > So I'm open for alternatives that would equally handle version > control, but is easier for documentation writers to cope with. > > This can be a completely different tool that feels more intuitive or > it can be a system layered on top of git which would hide git'

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 15:08:54 CEST schreef Derek Atkins: > Geert Janssens writes: > > [snip] > > > So I'm open for alternatives that would equally handle version > > control, but is easier for documentation writers to cope with. > > > > This can be a completely different tool that feel

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 6:37 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op donderdag 23 augustus 2018 15:08:54 CEST schreef Derek Atkins: >> Geert Janssens writes: >> >> [snip] >> >>> So I'm open for alternatives that would equally handle version >>> control, but is easier for documentation writers to c

Re: [GNC-dev] Python: About Wrapping SWIG Objects (GncNumeric)

Am 2018-08-06 16:14, schrieb John Ralls: On Aug 6, 2018, at 5:19 AM, c.holterm...@gmx.de wrote: Am 2018-08-06 11:35, schrieb Geert Janssens: Op maandag 6 augustus 2018 05:32:27 CEST schreef John Ralls: > On Aug 5, 2018, at 5:17 PM, c.holterm...@gmx.de wrote: > > Hello, > > after some time I ge

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 12:45 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 21:24:25 CEST schreef John Ralls: >>> On Aug 21, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Geert Janssens >>> wrote: - it should allow multiple output formats. A few the come to mind: >>> html, pdf, epub, mobi, windows compress

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 12:37 AM, Geert Janssens > wrote: > > Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 20:50:38 CEST schreef Geert Janssens: >> Op dinsdag 21 augustus 2018 17:49:57 CEST schreef Adrien Monteleone: >>> but is there a list of ’needs’ of the >>> developers to use when evaluating methods? >> >>

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:40 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > > So a new thought: One of the core devs use pandoc to convert the DocBook > source to one of the markup/markdown variants, do the necessary manual > fixups and commit the result. If we want DocBook for some reason the build > process would

[GNC-dev] Python C++ bindings - Re: Python: About Wrapping SWIG Objects (GncNumeric)

Am 2018-08-23 16:52, schrieb c.holterm...@gmx.de: Am 2018-08-06 16:14, schrieb John Ralls: On Aug 6, 2018, at 5:19 AM, c.holterm...@gmx.de wrote: Am 2018-08-06 11:35, schrieb Geert Janssens: Op maandag 6 augustus 2018 05:32:27 CEST schreef John Ralls: > On Aug 5, 2018, at 5:17 PM, c.holterm..

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Rob Gowin wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:40 AM, John Ralls wrote: > > > So a new thought: One of the core devs use pandoc to convert the DocBook > source to one of the markup/markdown variants, do the necessary manual fixups > and commit the resul

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

Hmm. Let me see if I understand this correctly. You’re saying that I could make edits on my own forked copy of gnucash-docs, save those changes, and get them to the official gnucash-docs *all from the github website*? *If* I understand it correctly, then this would be a big improvement from my

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

David, It’s git. It’s never difficult to remove stuff, but on the website there’s no reflow to get back what you’ve deleted, so take a little more care than usual. (Well, there is, but not from the web interface: https://medium.com/git-tips/githubs-reflog-a9ff21ff765f

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC] Column widths again)

So. I just tried this out on bug 791169. I believe it worked? On August 23, 2018, at 11:47 PM, John Ralls wrote: David, It’s git. It’s never difficult to remove stuff, but on the website there’s no reflow to get back what you’ve deleted, so take a  little more care than usual. (Well, there i

Re: [GNC-dev] Register Documentation Improvements (was Re: [GNC]Column widths again)

> So does GitHub (it’s the pencil icon to the right of Raw/Blame/History), > which also has a desktop front-end, https://desktop.github.com/ > and a button on a file’s webpage that opens the > file in Github Desktop. > I haven’t tried any of them, but perhaps David