Re: report in python, a first version

2016-11-17 Thread Geert Janssens
On Wednesday 16 November 2016 17:57:27 John Ralls wrote: > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:19 PM, Sébastien de Menten > > wrote: Still hoping *complexity* is not > > considered a feature ;-) > > > > > It's the html string that I'm particularly worried about, because > > > that gets you to a well-known li

compile errors

2016-11-17 Thread Alex Aycinena
Hi, I get the following compile errors today: /home/gnucash-dev/gitcheckouts/gnucash-clean/src/backend/sql/gnc-account-sql.cpp: In member function ‘virtual void GncSqlAccountBackend::load_all(GncSqlBackend*)’: /home/gnucash-dev/gitcheckouts/gnucash-clean/src/backend/sql/gnc-account-sql.cpp:239:9:

Re: compile errors

2016-11-17 Thread John Ralls
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Alex Aycinena wrote: > > Hi, > > I get the following compile errors today: > > /home/gnucash-dev/gitcheckouts/gnucash-clean/src/backend/sql/gnc-account-sql.cpp: > In member function ‘virtual void > GncSqlAccountBackend::load_all(GncSqlBackend*)’: > /home/gnucash-

Commit 10b006fdc1fe67c6caff7efca163406c89e78187

2016-11-17 Thread Matthew Forbis via gnucash-devel
Hi, I've been lurking on the list for a while and looking at all the code changes to try to better understand c++ programming, but I saw this one that was merged today and it didn't look right, but I might be missing something.  In src/backend/sql/gnc-transaction-sql.cpp, at line 964, I think a

Fwd: Still Failing: Gnucash/gnucash#778 (master - 1774de7)

2016-11-17 Thread John Ralls
Hey Rob, This failed because I forgot to update POTFILES for the newly created files and ninja check didn't catch it. Can you teach CMake to generate intltool checks? Regards, John Ralls > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Travis CI > Subject: Still Failing: Gnucash/gnucash#778 (master - 177

Re: Commit 10b006fdc1fe67c6caff7efca163406c89e78187

2016-11-17 Thread John Ralls
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 6:20 PM, Matthew Forbis via gnucash-devel > wrote: > > Hi, > I've been lurking on the list for a while and looking at all the code changes > to try to better understand c++ programming, but I saw this one that was > merged today and it didn't look right, but I might be m