On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> On Nov 18, 2014, at 7:10 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've converted QofCollection to a C++ class. A side-effect is that I
>> have to make src/test-core be able to compile in C++. I'm an absolute
>> newbie to autotools, still not
> On Nov 20, 2014, at 5:37 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> Why do you want to compile test-core in C++?
>>
>
> src/test-core/unittest-support.h includes qof.h
Lots of code includes qof.h. That's not a good reason to migrate test-core to
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:36 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
>> On Nov 20, 2014, at 5:37 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>> Why do you want to compile test-core in C++?
>>>
>>
>> src/test-core/unittest-support.h includes qof.h
>
> Lots of code inclu
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> Is it acceptable that I rename the new class to
> another name temporarily, such as QofCollectionClass, and keep the new
> class implementation and original one's existing simultaneously. I
> know this looks strange, but the change only affec
Hi Geert,
> gncOwnerApplyPayment is one option. The other is
> gncInvoiceApplyPayment. The former is the most generic one, the latter
> is a convenience function that lets you apply a payment to one
> specific invoice.
Thanks for this - I'd missed gncInvoiceApplyPayment but it turns out
this is
On Nov 20, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:36 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 20, 2014, at 5:37 AM, Chenxiong Qi wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:17 AM, John Ralls wrote:
>>>
Why do you want to compile test-core in C++?
>>>
>>> sr
Folks,
I would like to start by saying that I remain in awe of the ongoing development
effort put forth by the team and community with this software. It really is
amazing.
I am not a developer, and am unable to contribute to the programming cause.
However, the problems with the 2.6.4 release
On Nov 20, 2014, at 4:01 PM, David T. wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I would like to start by saying that I remain in awe of the ongoing
> development effort put forth by the team and community with this software. It
> really is amazing.
>
> I am not a developer, and am unable to contribute to the pro
John,
Thanks for clarifying. I sure hope the situation gets resolved soon!
David
On Nov 20, 2014, at 4:23 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2014, at 4:01 PM, David T. wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I would like to start by saying that I remain in awe of the ongoing
>> development effort put
Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:23:38
<9a4e0683-21e6-4e34-ac60-90f5cd414...@ceridwen.us> John Ralls
On Nov 20, 2014, at 4:01 PM, David T. wrote:
Folks,
I would like to start by saying that I remain in awe of the ongoing
development effort put forth by the team and community with this
software. It
10 matches
Mail list logo