Hi Chandrakant,
I did not see the e-mail you refer to.
List, did someone else see such mail ? Just to be sure it didn't get
blocked by my ISP's mail filter.
Geert
On Wednesday 24 September 2014 21:35:54 chandrakant dhutadmal wrote:
> Hi Geert.
>
> Did you get my yesterday's mail with all upda
Hi Geert,
yes, yesterday 11:43 h
Regards
Johannes
Am 25.09.2014 16:16, schrieb Geert Janssens:
Hi Chandrakant,
I did not see the e-mail you refer to.
List, did someone else see such mail ? Just to be sure it didn't get
blocked by my ISP's mail filter.
Geert
On Wednesday 24 September 201
All,
I got gnucash recompiled last night (boost slowed me down), so I am hoping
to grab the po files this evening and add them to the code base, then open
a "bug" in bugzilla to add them in git-patch mode for others to pick up.
--- Jeff Earickson
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Geert Janssens
On Sep 25, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Jeff Earickson wrote:
> All,
>
> I got gnucash recompiled last night (boost slowed me down), so I am hoping
> to grab the po files this evening and add them to the code base, then open
> a "bug" in bugzilla to add them in git-patch mode for others to pick up.
Jeff,
All,
What is the preferred language code for the po directory, 639-1 (two
letter) or 639-02 (three letter)? Should something like Hindi be "hi.po"
or "hin.po"?
I am looking at the pile of Indian translations sent in tonight. The po
files are nice and clean, some of the new ones will replace ea
Probably the former, 2-letter codes...
Whatever the official locale codes are.
-derek
Sent on my mobile. Please forgive any typos.
- Reply message -
From: "Jeff Earickson"
To:
Subject: Translation files, ISO 639-1 or 639-2 prefered?
Date: Thu, Sep 25, 2014 7:34 PM
All,
What is the p
The problem is that ISO has multiple code versions, and Jeff wants to know
which version GnuCash will use. According to ISO:
ISO 639 is composed of six different parts
Part 1 (ISO 639-1:2002) provides a 2 letter code that has been designed to
represent most of the major languages of the worl
Gang,
For those Indic languages that have 639-1 codes, I used them. Otherwise, I
used the 639-2 codes. This seemed to be the convention that I saw in the
po subdirectory.
Most Indic languages have two-letter codes.
Jeff Earickson
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 9:32 PM, David T. wrote:
> The proble
