Keeping this on the list...
That's documentation, of a sort. Not great, but it does pretty much
verify that there is nothing in there for handling budget, or future
transactions. Since I would need that in order to do a proper
forecasting report (Balance Sheet on an arbitrary date in the fut
On May 31, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Keeping this on the list...
>
> That's documentation, of a sort. Not great, but it does pretty much verify
> that there is nothing in there for handling budget, or future transactions.
> Since I would need that in order to do a proper forec
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Keeping this on the list...
>
> That's documentation, of a sort. Not great, but it does pretty much
> verify that there is nothing in there for handling budget, or future
> transactions. Since I would need that in order to do a pr
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 12:27:25PM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
>
> Why not instead add python to the swig files for the API that you need? It's
> only one header, gnc-budget.h, and you can use the Guile adapter code in
> src/engine/engine.i as a guide.
>
not quite as simple as this - I added gnc-
Am Sonntag, 25. Mai 2014, 07:34:14 schrieb John Ralls:
> >> If we've reached the point where our int64 rational numbers do not fit
> >> our problem requirements anymore, I'd rather look for a different number
> >> representation that fits our application domain better. I'm thinking
> >> about repla
And I did it again!
Sorry, John and David.
On 05/31/2014 03:14 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Ooops! I meant to send this to the list.
Marc
-
All in all it sounds like it would be a lot more work that I am really
up to at this time. Of course, learning Scheme/Guile is not really
--On May 31, 2014 11:19:23 PM +0200 Christian Stimming
wrote:
But back to your initial question: You said we occasionally
"encounter overflow errors". I don't understand (yet) what the
actual problem is. With our current rational numbers and int64_t
numerator we have approx. 19 decimal digi
On May 31, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 25. Mai 2014, 07:34:14 schrieb John Ralls:
If we've reached the point where our int64 rational numbers do not fit
our problem requirements anymore, I'd rather look for a different number
representation that fits
On May 31, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Ooops! I meant to send this to the list.
>
> Marc
>
> -
>
> All in all it sounds like it would be a lot more work that I am really up to
> at this time. Of course, learning Scheme/Guile is not really any better.
>
> What I
On May 31, 2014, at 3:20 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
> --On May 31, 2014 11:19:23 PM +0200 Christian Stimming
> wrote:
>
>> But back to your initial question: You said we occasionally
>> "encounter overflow errors". I don't understand (yet) what the
>> actual problem is. With our current rati
10 matches
Mail list logo
