Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread Derek Atkins
John Ralls writes: > On Apr 4, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> John Ralls writes: >> >>> Probably not. You can get a win32 binary at >>> http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4-windows.zip >> >> Even better, the 'tar' we have on the builder doesn't support -J either. >> How frustrating! Wh

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 5, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > John Ralls writes: > >> On Apr 4, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: >> >>> John Ralls writes: >>> Probably not. You can get a win32 binary at http://tukaani.org/xz/xz-5.0.4-windows.zip >>> >>> Even better, the 'tar' we have o

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread Derek Atkins
John Ralls writes: >> Fair enough.. But it would require pulling down xzcat early in the >> build script, and integrating that into the build as another way to >> unpackage. Much more work than just reverting to the last .bz2 tarball >> ;) > > For now, yes. At some point we'll have to do it. It

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 5, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: > > I've already fired off a build; it skipped the daily because it was > already done (there were no changes to trunk since the last build), but > it's currently building 2.5.0. I was going to send an email once it > finished, one way or the othe

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread Derek Atkins
We have a successful 2.5.0 build. It is sitting on code now. Strangely it is a significantly smaller setup.exe than 2.4.x has been. Maybe due to the changed dependencies? -derek On Fri, April 5, 2013 12:50 pm, John Ralls wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Derek Atkins wrote: >> >> I've alr

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 5. April 2013, 15:56:43 schrieb Derek Atkins: > We have a successful 2.5.0 build. It is sitting on code now. > > Strangely it is a significantly smaller setup.exe than 2.4.x has been. > Maybe due to the changed dependencies? The smaller size is expecially strange compared to yesterd

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

2013-04-05 Thread John Ralls
On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Christian Stimming wrote: > Am Freitag, 5. April 2013, 15:56:43 schrieb Derek Atkins: >> We have a successful 2.5.0 build. It is sitting on code now. >> >> Strangely it is a significantly smaller setup.exe than 2.4.x has been. >> Maybe due to the changed dependencie