Re: r22865 - gnucash/tags/2.5.0 - Tag 2.5.0 Retag for Windows

Hi Derek, I've added a configure argument in the libgsf build. As before, we first need to check this with the trunk build. Can you remove the c:\soft\libgsf folder and trigger the normal build again? Thanks! Christian Zitat von Derek Atkins : On Tue, April 2, 2013 4:34 pm, Derek Atkin

Re: GnuCash releases ?

Hi, Just to double check, I have updated my local git and cloned it and updated it with all the patches in the bugs successfully. I believe you may of started at the wrong bug so here is the order I did them in :- Bug 696152 Bug 695773 Bug 696868, first patch Bug 696868, second patch Bug 697140,

Fwd: Re: V2.4.12 download links incorrect

Another page with a link that did not get updated, this one on SourceForge: --- Begin Message --- Fixed it! Thanks for the report. Il 01/04/2013 20:45, Fred Bone ha scritto: Not sure where I should be posting this but ... The announcement section

Re: r22865 - gnucash/tags/2.5.0 - Tag 2.5.0 Retag for Windows

Christian Stimming writes: > Hi Derek, > > I've added a configure argument in the libgsf build. As before, we > first need to check this with the trunk build. Can you remove the > c:\soft\libgsf folder and trigger the normal build again? Thanks! > > Christian Failed with: !!! libgsf not instal

Re: GnuCash releases ?

On Apr 3, 2013, at 2:05 AM, Robert Fewell <14ubo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just to double check, I have updated my local git and cloned it and updated > it with all the patches in the bugs successfully. I believe you may of > started at the wrong bug so here is the order I did them in :- >

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

Unfortunately this results in a 404. Cannot download the libgsf package. -derek On Wed, April 3, 2013 9:21 am, Christian Stimming wrote: > Author: cstim > Date: 2013-04-03 09:21:21 -0400 (Wed, 03 Apr 2013) > New Revision: 22869 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/22869 > > Modified: >

Re: V2.4.12 download links incorrect

On Apr 3, 2013, at 5:19 AM, David Carlson wrote: > Another page with a link that did not get updated, this one on > SourceForge: Fixed, thanks. Regards, John Ralls ___ gnucash-devel mailing list gnucas

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

On Apr 3, 2013, at 6:49 AM, "Derek Atkins" wrote: > Unfortunately this results in a 404. Cannot download the libgsf package. > > -derek > >> >> "$GNOME_MIRROR/sources/libgsf/1.14/libgsf-${LIBGSF_VERSION}.tar.bz2" >> All of the Gnome tarballs are now compressed with xz; gz and bz2 are no l

Re: r22869 - gnucash/trunk/packaging/win32 - Win32 build: Can we get along without libgsf-gnome?

On Wed, April 3, 2013 9:49 am, Derek Atkins wrote: > Unfortunately this results in a 404. Cannot download the libgsf package. This appears to be due to gnome changing from bz2 to xz compression. So there is no libgsf-1.14.26.tar.bz2, only libgsf-1.14.26.tar.xz -derek -- Derek Atkins

Fwd: Re: V2.4.12 download links incorrect

Another page with a link that did not get updated, this one on SourceForge: --- Begin Message --- Fixed it! Thanks for the report. Il 01/04/2013 20:45, Fred Bone ha scritto: Not sure where I should be posting this but ... The announcement section