On 07-02-13 19:32, John Ralls wrote:
Geert mentioned in the Notification Emails thread that he'd like to get 2.6 released in
less than a year, and Christian was pushing to do so this time *last* year. On the
principle that "Release is a misnomer. Software is never released, it escapes."
[1], i
On 07-02-13 19:32, John Ralls wrote:
Geert mentioned in the Notification Emails thread that he'd like to get 2.6 released in
less than a year, and Christian was pushing to do so this time *last* year. On the
principle that "Release is a misnomer. Software is never released, it escapes."
[1], i
On 07-02-13 18:51, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens writes:
Of note still is that the mail is sent by GIT SVN Migration user
(git-svn). This is because the mail generation is triggered by the
the svn-git push, which is currently always performed by the user
account git-svn. With the scripts
On 07-02-13 18:53, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens writes:
3. Even though it may take some time before we're fully in git, we can
already start sending mails from git and disable sending mails from
svn earlier. It's one less dependency on svn that way. As said, I will
first need to find a s
On 07-02-13 19:21, John Ralls wrote:
On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
On 07-02-13 16:42, John Ralls wrote:
Do we want to be sending commit-mail from gitolite while we're still committing
to svn? ISTM that's something to turn on after we drop svn. Not that you
shouldn't have
On Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:13:01 +0100
Geert Janssens wrote:
> On 07-02-13 19:32, John Ralls wrote:
> > Geert mentioned in the Notification Emails thread that he'd like to
> > get 2.6 released in less than a year, and Christian was pushing to
> > do so this time *last* year. On the principle that "Re
On 07-02-13 16:35, John Ralls wrote:
On Feb 7, 2013, at 7:21 AM, David Carlson wrote:
As I requested in this closed bug, which is not in the current program release and may
not be in the current release for many more months, how about adding a status
"Awaiting next Program Release" so the bu
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:49 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On 07-02-13 19:21, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Feb 7, 2013, at 8:42 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
>>
>>> On 07-02-13 16:42, John Ralls wrote:
Do we want to be sending commit-mail from gitolite while we're still
committing to svn? ISTM that
Geert Janssens writes:
> Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is
> only meant to be *ready* to be migrated. This means getting rid of all
> the deprecated gtk symbols. Other than the register this is done. So
> the register rewrite is actually important for this goal,
On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Geert Janssens writes:
>
>> Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is
>> only meant to be *ready* to be migrated. This means getting rid of all
>> the deprecated gtk symbols. Other than the register this is done. So
>
On 08-02-13 16:20, John Ralls wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens writes:
Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is
only meant to be *ready* to be migrated. This means getting rid of all
the deprecated gtk symbols. Other than the
On Feb 8, 2013, at 8:08 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On 08-02-13 16:20, John Ralls wrote:
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 7:09 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>>> Geert Janssens writes:
>>>
Forgot to mention: Gtk3 was indeed not on the agenda for 2.6. 2.6 is
only meant to be *ready* to be migrated
Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, 09:51:57 schrieb John Ralls:
> >>> Personnaly I'd rather see us move to Qt instead of Gtk3 when that
> >>> decision has to be made.
> >
> > I did express my interest in Qt before in mails to the list.
> >
> > But when you also want to switch to C++ and Boost, to me th
On 2/8/2013 3:03 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, 09:51:57 schrieb John Ralls:
> Personnaly I'd rather see us move to Qt instead of Gtk3 when that
> decision has to be made.
>>> I did express my interest in Qt before in mails to the list.
>>>
>>> But when you als
At this point, there's an itch which is bothering me more and it's in the
budgeting area. I'm separating the budget plugin page into the page and the
budget display widget so I can enhance the widget by adding more info. I want
a fixed "total" column, and fixed "income", "expense" and "transfe
On Feb 8, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, 09:51:57 schrieb John Ralls:
> Personnaly I'd rather see us move to Qt instead of Gtk3 when that
> decision has to be made.
>>>
>>> I did express my interest in Qt before in mails to the list.
>>>
>>>
16 matches
Mail list logo
