That is indeed interesting to know. Thanks.
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Yawar Amin wrote:
>
> Thanks for letting us know. I went to your blog and discovered Pencil
> for Firefox, which I am liking very much for making mockups etc. Also
> you might be interested to learn that the Pencil team
I already found one memory leak and one uninitialized variable when running the
libqof/qof unit tests under valgrind. Can we set up all unit tests to run with
valgrind automatically?
Phil
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https:
Phil,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 2:36 pm, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> I already found one memory leak and one uninitialized variable when
> running the libqof/qof unit tests under valgrind. Can we set up all unit
> tests to run with valgrind automatically?
i would object to that. I always run "make check
On May 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> I already found one memory leak and one uninitialized variable when running
> the libqof/qof unit tests under valgrind. Can we set up all unit tests to
> run with valgrind automatically?
I don't think we want to impose the performance hit
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 13:30:11 schrieb John Ralls:
> On May 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> > I already found one memory leak and one uninitialized variable when
> > running the libqof/qof unit tests under valgrind. Can we set up all
> > unit tests to run with valgrind automatica
On May 21, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Christian Stimming wrote:
> Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 13:30:11 schrieb John Ralls:
>> On May 21, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
>>> I already found one memory leak and one uninitialized variable when
>>> running the libqof/qof unit tests under valgrind. Can
Yes. A lot of the leaks are in the unit test code. But I've found 2
legitimate leaks as well.
Phil
From: John Ralls
To: Christian Stimming
Cc: gnucash-devel@gnucash.org; Phil Longstaff
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 4:56:52 PM
Subject: Re: Running unit tests
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Yes. A lot of the leaks are in the unit test code. But I've found 2
> legitimate leaks as well.
Do you guys run the whole system under valgrind (John is obviously
right about tests on the parts don't necessarily say anything about
the wh
On May 21, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Phil Longstaff
> wrote:
>> Yes. A lot of the leaks are in the unit test code. But I've found 2
>> legitimate leaks as well.
>
> Do you guys run the whole system under valgrind (John is obviously
> right abou
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:10 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> On May 21, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Donald Allen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Phil Longstaff
>> wrote:
>>> Yes. A lot of the leaks are in the unit test code. But I've found 2
>>> legitimate leaks as well.
>>
>> Do you guys run t
10 matches
Mail list logo
