Hi,
I am interested in working on Cutecash as a GSoC 2011 project.
I have experience with C/C++ and Python, however am not familiar with Qt.
Since the wiki mentions I would have time to learn it, its not an issue I
assume.
However, I do not have any experience with finance, or money management of
a
I would like to propose an additional idea for GSoC 2011.
This is a very abstract proposal, as I have not yet used GNUCash or seen the
source, so I do not know if its practical to implement it. Please do tell me
if its practical, I will expand upon it:
A mobile application(QT can be used if Symbi
I had the privilege to apply the fist series of patches to trunk after the 2.4
branch was created. After some IRC chat with Derek yesterday, I think these
patches require some more explanation and discussion.
The birdseye view to this issue is this:
* In total I applied 12 patches, which actuall
On maandag 21 maart 2011, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Geert Janssens writes:
> > Yay !
> >
> > I'm a bit busy right now, but later this week I'll push some of the
> > developments I have been working on (guile 1.8, gnome-druid
> > replacement,...).
>
> A couple to-dos:
>
> 1) Make the 2.4 branch win3
On maandag 21 maart 2011, Stephen Brown wrote:
> Hi Derek, Geert & Christian
> At the moment I am successfully building under Microsoft Vista whatever the
> install.sh build scripts build,
> which If I understand
> what is being said in this thread correctly is the stable version. I want
> to devel
Geert,
you say "the updated gcc can't build the stable branch on Windows". What is
the
problem?
I don't have the details handy, but I am experimenting with a different gcc
build (tdm gcc http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/) which seems more up-to-date than
mingw. I am trying to build webkit/gtk for
Geert Janssens writes:
[snip]
> What do you think ? Which solution would be preferable and realistic
> (in terms of effort vs gain) ?
I think it would be cool if there were some way in the 'branch' to say
what build system is required. Then we could effectively do:
- checkout branch/tag
- run
Forgot to add: one advantage if this works vs the script to build webkit in the
gnucash tree is that this method doesn't require cygwin but uses mingw+msys.
Phil
-
I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it.
From: Phil
Geert Janssens writes:
> Gnucash no longer requires slib.
W00t! Thank you Andy! This has been a long time coming.
-derek
--
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/
On dinsdag 22 maart 2011, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Geert,
>
> you say "the updated gcc can't build the stable branch on Windows". What
> is the problem?
>
guile 1.6 won't build with gcc 4.x. I don't remember the exact details, but I
do remember I couldn't figure out how to fix this after several
Christian,
> However, even the first not-yet-applied patch,
build-core-python-swig.patch,
> doesn't compile (and needed some hand tweaking due to new changes
upstream,
> but that wasn't a problem):
>
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> swig-app-utils-python.c:3677: error: no previous prototy
I don't know yet whether webkit can be built with mingw's gcc 4.5.2. There are
dependency hassles. Webkit/gtk uses a bleeding-edge libsoup which is more
recent than the version on ftp.gnome.org so it needs to be built from source.
The webkit/gtk build page says that the built version of libxs
Thanks Geert for the patches and the exhaustive explanation. I'm out of town
and will reply in detail later. But I think we shouldn't waste any effort on
the building that isn't absolutely necessary. I'd say we set up a second VM
with the gcc4 build for trunk, and use the existing one for 2.4 an
On dinsdag 22 maart 2011, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Geert Janssens writes:
>
> [snip]
>
> > What do you think ? Which solution would be preferable and realistic
> > (in terms of effort vs gain) ?
>
> I think it would be cool if there were some way in the 'branch' to say
> what build system is requi
Hello,
I am interested to work on above mentioned project this summer as a part
of GSoC.
I have programming experience with Python, C and Scheme. I have built
the source code and am getting familiar with the code. Currently going
through the python scripts present in the code.
Wanted to get som
All,
Thanks for your feedback on th guile 1.8/gcc 4.5.2 issue.
I have looked into it in more detail and it turned out to be relatively easy
to make mingw (and hence gcc) more volatile, just like all the other
dependencies.
I have commited a set of 4 patches:
http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changes
Well, this particular checkin (N_ in the root module), or the ones fixing bugs
(from Andy Wingo) looked to me like they could be applied to 2.4. They
wouldn't
need to since they don't fix user-visible bugs.
Brings up the question of whether the 2.4.X releases are simply bug fixes or
can
new
On Mar 21, 2011, at 9:30 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Well, this particular checkin (N_ in the root module), or the ones fixing
> bugs
> (from Andy Wingo) looked to me like they could be applied to 2.4. They
> wouldn't
> need to since they don't fix user-visible bugs.
>
> Brings up the quest
18 matches
Mail list logo
