The subject sounds a bit ominous, but I don't mean it to be.
2.4.0 is now out the door. Already there are ideas rolling in about the
next enhancements. I was just about to tackle one of the enhancements
when instead, I thought I would (again) raise a broader issue.
A few months ago, Christian S
Hi,
Am Samstag, 25. Dezember 2010 um 19:52:46 schrieb John Ralls:
> We also need to get the bug count down. There are almost 1000 of them open,
> and nearly half are more than 1 year old. A huge chunk of the older ones
> are enhancement requests which we should either add to the Roadmap or deny.
On Dec 28, 2010, at 6:52 AM, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> The subject sounds a bit ominous, but I don't mean it to be.
>
> 2.4.0 is now out the door. Already there are ideas rolling in about the
> next enhancements. I was just about to tackle one of the enhancements
> when instead, I thought I woul
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:50 -0800, John Ralls wrote:
> I'd much prefer C++ to GObjects, but either is better than the GObjects
> without the G that you used for the dbi/sql backend. We can make the
> transition gradually, as C++ and C inter-operate nicely.
Yeah. That just grew. c++ would have
I had a long, rambling message, but I'll summarize. Please excuse the
bluntness. I'm not a Gnucash developer, but could be. My opinions might be
technically wrong, and make me a self-destructive asshole, but I'm happy
with that.
The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
2nd/run
On Dec 28, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Frank H. Ellenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, 25. Dezember 2010 um 19:52:46 schrieb John Ralls:
>> We also need to get the bug count down. There are almost 1000 of them open,
>> and nearly half are more than 1 year old. A huge chunk of the older ones
>> are enhan
Dear Phil,
thanks for bringing up this issue now that we managed to get 2.4.0 out.
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Phil Longstaff:
> A few months ago, Christian Stimming started CuteCash with the aims of
> replacing gtk by Qt/C++. The idea was that development in gtk/C was too
> slow and
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
> The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
> 2nd/runtime/scripting language?"
>
> In 2010/2011, given that Gnucash isn't a game, there is really only one
> choice: Javascript. While http://live.gnome.org/Gjs seems rather dea
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb John Ralls:
> > I think, the roadmap should show the general direction, while RFEs in
> > bugzilla can also be small details. I often add entries there, which I
> > would like to improve later, may be next year. I would miss the
> > reminder, if they would be
2010/12/28 Christian Stimming :
> Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010 schrieb Jeff Warnica:
>> The question shouldn't be "C++ or not", but "what is the best
>> 2nd/runtime/scripting language?"
>>
>> In 2010/2011, given that Gnucash isn't a game, there is really only one
>> choice: Javascript. While http
--On December 28, 2010 10:27:48 PM +0100 Christian Stimming
wrote:
It seems to me my C++ experiment (as I would call it) has still not
yet been understood the way I thought, so I'll elaborate a bit on
what I did and what my conclusions are. Incidentally, I'm a
scientist. If I make some claim
Phil,
Are you sure that scm_to_locale_string() is returning a g_alloc'ed string
and not a malloc'ed string? You cannot mix-and-match malloc/free and
g_alloc/g_free.
-derek
On Tue, December 28, 2010 8:36 pm, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Author: plongstaff
> Date: 2010-12-28 20:36:26 -0500 (Tue, 28 De
Hey. You top-posted. :)
Anyhow,
from
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Conversion-to_002ffrom-C.html
— C Function: char * scm_to_locale_string (SCM str)
— C Function: char * scm_to_locale_stringn (SCM str, size_t *lenp)
Returns a C string in the current locale encoding
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 20:49 -0500, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> Hey. You top-posted. :)
>
> Anyhow,
>
> from
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Conversion-to_002ffrom-C.html
>
> — C Function: char * scm_to_locale_string (SCM str)
> — C Function: char * scm_to_locale_stringn (SCM s
On Tue, December 28, 2010 8:55 pm, Phil Longstaff wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 20:49 -0500, Phil Longstaff wrote:
>> Anyhow,
>>
>> from
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Conversion-to_002ffrom-C.html
>>
>> â C Function: char * scm_to_locale_string (SCM str)
>> â C Function
On Dec 28, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Mike Alexander wrote:
> --On December 28, 2010 10:27:48 PM +0100 Christian Stimming
> wrote:
>
>> It seems to me my C++ experiment (as I would call it) has still not
>> yet been understood the way I thought, so I'll elaborate a bit on
>> what I did and what my co
I’m working on a documentation update for the bug below. I’ve attached a patch,
will commit in a few days if all OK.
On a related note, what is the difference between New File and New Account
Hierarchy in practice? It seems to me they accomplish the same thing.
Cheers,
Yawar
On 2010-12-28, at
John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
> 2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
> libraries which have been deprecated for several years upon which Gnucash
> at present depends. All code that depends on those libraries needs to get
> rewritten or we're not going t
On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
>> 2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
>> libraries which have been deprecated for several years upon which Gnucash
>> at present depends. All code that depends on th
On Dec 28, 2010, at 8:44 PM, Yawar Amin wrote:
> I’m working on a documentation update for the bug below. I’ve attached a
> patch, will commit in a few days if all OK.
>
> On a related note, what is the difference between New File and New Account
> Hierarchy in practice? It seems to me they ac
John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
>
> On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
> >> 2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
> >> libraries which have been deprecated for several years upon which Gnucash
On Dec 28, 2010, at 10:16 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
>>
>> On Dec 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>>> John Ralls (jra...@ceridwen.us) said:
2. Gtk+-3.0 is supposed to be released next month. It removes a bunch of
libraries whi
--On December 28, 2010 6:09:59 PM -0800 John Ralls
wrote:
There are two drivers for reimplementation:
1. One of our goals for 2.6 is to enable multiple simultaneous access
to a dataset. In order to get there, large swaths of existing code
need to be rewritten to interact directly with the dat
23 matches
Mail list logo
