Re: r18644 - gnucash/trunk/src/backend/sql - Fix comment close

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 12 February 2010, Phil Longstaff wrote: > Author: plongstaff > Date: 2010-02-12 12:45:59 -0500 (Fri, 12 Feb 2010) > New Revision: 18644 > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/18644 > > Modified: >gnucash/trunk/src/backend/sql/gnc-backend-sql.h > Log: > Fix comment close > >

Re: Patchfile - corrections to taxtxf.scm

2010-02-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena: > Christian, > > I was thinking after sending this, should it be applied to both trunk and > 2.3.9? I guess you mean 2.2.9, the 2.2-branch? No, we won't make any further 2.2.x release, so we also don't need to apply any patch to that. Rega

Re: Patchfile - corrections to taxtxf.scm

2010-02-13 Thread Christian Stimming
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena: > Christian, > > I attach a patchfile that corrects two problems with taxtxf.scm: Applied to trunk (will be in 2.3.9 once it is released). Thanks a lot! By the way, patches in bugzilla are IMHO somewhat easier to handle because for patches

Re: Post invoice dialog default focus

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
On Friday 12 February 2010, Tommy Trussell wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Geert Janssens > > wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Derek Atkins wrote: > >> Geert Janssens writes: > >> > I'm not aware of this focus issue in the register. What is the problem > >> > exactly ? (Link t

qof vs gnc functions ?

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
I was looking into this bug that seemed a fairly trivial to fix: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343727 That is, if some consensus can be reached on what type the currency should be from a qof point of view. The op proposed QOF_TYPE_STRING, although Derek wasn't fully convinced. And i

discrepency in version of Windows release

2010-02-13 Thread Anne Lawrence
I clicked on the link on http://www.gnucash.org/ for the latest stable version of gnucash for Windows, which is advertised as v2.2.9 and downloaded it. The file downloaded was v2.3.3. I have been running it but it has appeared with a message that it is not a stable build. I have recently star

Please back out r18428 - editable 2nd date field

2010-02-13 Thread Kim Wood
The has been some discussion in the user forum at http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html#a1476778 about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is particularly bad and should be removed for two reasons. Firstly, in double line register display mode, the two dates display

Re: discrepency in version of Windows release

2010-02-13 Thread Geert Janssens
On Saturday 13 February 2010, Anne Lawrence wrote: > I clicked on the link on http://www.gnucash.org/ for the latest stable > version of gnucash for Windows, which is advertised as v2.2.9 and > downloaded it. The file downloaded was v2.3.3. I have been running it > but it has appeared with a me

Re: Please back out r18428 - editable 2nd date field

2010-02-13 Thread Jeff Kletsky
I have to strongly second this request. In my opinion, this is a "half-complete" feature. At a minimum, until there is a preference setting available, in my opinion, this should not be part of the trunk. Arguably, until sorting and searching is also available on the new field, similar to the

Re: Please back out r18428 - editable 2nd date field

2010-02-13 Thread Volker Englisch
On 02/13/2010 06:45 AM, Kim Wood wrote: [...] Am I alone in thinking that the register in double line mode now looks less user friendly? I'm not a developer but I agree with you completely. -- Volker Englisch mailto:vol...@englisch.us ___ gnucash