On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 01:15:43PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>
> On May 29, 2006, at 12:54 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> >>My experience suggests
> >>that if I weren't using gnu libtool, nothing would come close to
> >>working, as Apple's libtool is entirely unrelated to the functio
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes, my ltmain.sh has the line.
>>
>
> Any news on this front? Maybe we should ask some libtool folks for
> some help.
Are you sure that a shared object is still supposed to be called
".so" on Mac? Are you sure this isn't a glib/gmodule bug?
> -c
Guys, I've just reported a request for a correction of the date
presented in the reconcile dialog:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343527
I think my proposal is logic: I propose to simply have in that dialog
the current date.
Why does it put a date calculated according to the previous
Quoting don Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Guys, I've just reported a request for a correction of the date
presented in the reconcile dialog:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343527
I think my proposal is logic: I propose to simply have in that dialog
the current date.
Why does
Hi,
I have managed to import gncInvoice and set its owner to be a
gncCustomer. To do that I needed to do some changes in gncInvoice. Could
someone review the following and let me know if this is ok for future
inclusion in the main source. Also could someone explain to me why the
INVOICE_OWNER
Please be sure to CC: gnucash-devel on all replies..
Quoting don Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
El mié, 31-05-2006 a las 14:50 -0400, Derek Atkins escribió:
Quoting don Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343527
>
> I think my proposal is log
No, this is not okay. You should indirect yourself through the owner
interfaces. The invoice should not need to know what kind of owner
it is.
-derek
Quoting Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
I have managed to import gncInvoice and set its owner to be a
gncCustomer. To do that I need
On June 10th, several of the developers are getting together in
Manhattan for lunch. I will be there, as well as Derek Atkins
, Josh Sled , and Christian Stimming from
Germany. Anyone who wants is welcome come join us for food and drinks.
Feel free to bring spouses/significant others too.
We're
Well, I can see several solutions to this:
1. Make gncOwner first class object
2. Do not make gncOwner first class object, but make a special hack in
QSF code for the gncOwner.
3. hmm, running out of ideas - any suggestions :-)
Also any ideas why the INVOICE_OWNER param doesn't have setter?
Re
Quoting Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, I can see several solutions to this:
1. Make gncOwner first class object
2. Do not make gncOwner first class object, but make a special hack
in QSF code for the gncOwner.
3. hmm, running out of ideas - any suggestions :-)
I talked with Neil a
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, I can see several solutions to this:
1. Make gncOwner first class object
2. Do not make gncOwner first class object, but make a special hack
in QSF code for the gncOwner.
3. hmm, running out of ideas - any suggestions :-
Quoting Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Actually there is a QOF_TYPE_CHOICE. It even seems working, i.e. I
have it in my xml and it doesn't segfaults :-)
I can see that gncOwner doesn't have QofInstance object at the start
of it's structure. So if a parameter getter returns a gncOwner into
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Actually there is a QOF_TYPE_CHOICE. It even seems working, i.e. I
have it in my xml and it doesn't segfaults :-)
I can see that gncOwner doesn't have QofInstance object at the start
of it's structure. So if a parameter getter
On May 31, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes, my ltmain.sh has the line.
Any news on this front? Maybe we should ask some libtool folks for
some help.
Are you sure that a shared object is still supposed to be called
".so" on Mac? Are
I've come up with what may be a bug, or may be my misuse of gnucash. I'd
welcome some advice.
I'm in the process of becoming VAT registered (in the UK) and I'm
reworking my gnucash accounts to cope. I've created VAT input[A] and
output[L] accounts and created two tax tables: VAT input and VAT outp
What's the currency/commodity of each account?
What's the Vendor's currency?
-derek
Quoting Nigel Titley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I've come up with what may be a bug, or may be my misuse of gnucash. I'd
welcome some advice.
I'm in the process of becoming VAT registered (in the UK) and I'm
reworki
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 18:36 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> What's the currency/commodity of each account?
> What's the Vendor's currency?
All GBP
>
> -derek
>
> Quoting Nigel Titley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > I've come up with what may be a bug, or may be my misuse of gnucash. I'd
> > welcome so
Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting don Paolo Benvenuto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Guys, I've just reported a request for a correction of the date
presented in the reconcile dialog:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343527
I think my proposal is logic: I propose to simply have in that dialog
the c
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:57:22PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> >Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>>Yes, my ltmain.sh has the line.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Any news on this front? Maybe we should ask some libtool folks for
> >>some
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:30:51PM -0400, Andreas Köhler wrote:
> Author: andi5
> Date: 2006-05-31 15:30:49 -0400 (Wed, 31 May 2006)
> New Revision: 14283
> Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/14283
>
> Modified:
>gnucash/trunk/ChangeLog
>gnucash/trunk/src/gnome-utils/gnc-tree-mode
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:30:51PM -0400, Andreas Köhler wrote:
> > Author: andi5
> > Date: 2006-05-31 15:30:49 -0400 (Wed, 31 May 2006)
> > New Revision: 14283
> > Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/14283
> >
> > Modified
Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes and no.. The idea is that QofChoice is a template type.. So
>> a GNC_ID_OWNER would be QofChoice. You
>> really can't say that it returns a QOF_TYPE_CHOICE because you need to
>> know what QofChoice template instance is returned.
>
> Actually it
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:47:53PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 08:01:02PM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> > I think there are some problems with this...
> >
> > 1) That stamp increment might not have been exactly correct, but I
> > think it's technically required. You'
On May 31, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:57:22PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
On May 31, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes, my ltmain.sh has the line.
Any news on this front? Maybe we should ask so
Derek Atkins wrote:
Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes and no.. The idea is that QofChoice is a template type.. So
a GNC_ID_OWNER would be QofChoice. You
really can't say that it returns a QOF_TYPE_CHOICE because you need to
know what QofChoice template instance is returned.
On May 31, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:57:22PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
On May 31, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes, my ltmain.sh has the line.
Any news on this front? Maybe we should ask so
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:17:24PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2006, at 7:39 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:57:22PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
> >>
> >>On May 31, 2006, at 1:22 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> >>
> >>>Chris Shoemaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:04:21AM +0300, Georgi Mirchev wrote:
>
> Derek Atkins wrote:
>
> >Georgi Mirchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >
> >>>Yes and no.. The idea is that QofChoice is a template type.. So
> >>>a GNC_ID_OWNER would be QofChoice. You
> >>>really can't say that it re
Josh Sled wrote:
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 16:17 -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
Quoting Eneko Lacunza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is there any date set for 1.9.7? Wiki release schedule date is gone :)
Oh, sorry.. Um, it was supposed to have happened this weekend but
I guess it didn't. I don
On May 31, 2006, at 10:28 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:17:24PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
[snip]
And from Peter O'Gorman:
"Gnucash has a whole bunch of libraries that are also loadable
modules
and is one of the reasons that dlcompat got written all those
years ago.
On May 31, 2006, at 10:28 PM, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:17:24PM -0400, David Reiser wrote:
This module is loaded using gmodule. I don't know if gmodule uses
libltdl.
and the latest comment from Peter O'Gorman:
"Ensure that the Makefile.am for this module has the
31 matches
Mail list logo
