It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
> I would also warn you that if you split the CGI, you then completely
> lose the benefits of any security, unless you pass the security
> metadata across from one program to the other.
???
A common way of providing 'security' with http/cgi is to
to gi
It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB engine should stay close;
> they will need to communicate quite a lot of data in order to negotiate
> the parts that are to be submitted to the GUI. A "for instance" would
> be that if the DB doe
It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
> Just to play devil's advocate let me throw another log on the fire:
> what we really want here is a distributed file system.
Before http was invented, these were considered for the web.
Unfortunately, nfs was not secure, and afs was propreitary
& to
It's been rumoured that Herbert Thoma said:
>
> Hi!
>
> With the newest cvs version I get a segfault when I
> try to import a old data file.
There's a whole variety of core dumps when importing old files
with the current cvs version. Many of these happen when
tryig to generate a report. Othe
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:12:07PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Eugene Tyurin writes:
> >
>
> > Is this really something a casual user who wants to balance his
> > checkbook and know how much he spends on beer can bear?
>
> Unless it's totally transparent to them, no. Basic
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:46:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >
> > It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB engine should stay close;
> > they will need to communicate quite a lot of data in order to negotiate
> > the parts that ar
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 03:16:28AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's a whole variety of core dumps when importing old files
> with the current cvs version. Many of these happen when
> tryig to generate a report.
Linas, the segfaults when trying to generate reports are a bug in
gtkhtml.
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 03:09:46AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (btw, in 'real' accounting systems, the actual balance is stored,
> and is not computed on the fly by totalling up all transactions.
> In gnucash, we total it on the fly because that was the easier thing
> to do at the time.)
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:56:45PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> Bill, I'm busily working on the pane code, and I need to get the
> actual widget from a gnc_report_window and shove it in a container.
>
> How do I do so?
You do it the other way 'round: pass it the container (must be a
Gt
> > Actually, I was looking at RPC/Corba/etc. over TCP, not over UDP. The
>
> I got the impression that you were advocating RPC over UDP.
Possibly a not-unreasonable impression, but that seems to me to be a
too low level perspective to focus on. Better to have a prototype that
works badly, and
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:23:41AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
>
> Can we not flame?
Yes, please!
> Id like to hear someone give a technical overview of how SOAP handles
> events.
I spent last night reading the w3c's SOAP 1.1 spec. Ugh. (Not an
editorial comment, just that reading s
Ok, I just built it (and figured out why it wasn't working for you, I
bet). I appears that I needed to downgrade my version of g-wrap,
because it wouldn't build with versions even as recent as 0.9.8. I
reverted back to 0.9.1 and it built fine. So, I've now got an RPM
for you. :)
-derek
<[EMAI
It's been rumoured that Derek Atkins said:
>
> Ok, I just built it (and figured out why it wasn't working for you, I
> bet). I appears that I needed to downgrade my version of g-wrap,
> because it wouldn't build with versions even as recent as 0.9.8. I
> reverted back to 0.9.1 and it built fine
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> I'm trying to keep up with the protocol issues here, although it isn't
> my strong suit. But for the record, the transport should, imnsho, be
> kept separate from the database itself. It is a layer to marshall
> requests to the database and return resp
It's been rumoured that Bill Gribble said:
> Linas, the segfaults when trying to generate reports are a bug in
> gtkhtml. It's fixed in their CVS version, and (I believe) in the
> packages that Jim LewisMoss is distributing.
>
> The proximate problem is that our reports tend to generate totally
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
>
> In my design, the database will be maintaining the balance. So does
> that mean gnucash will be a 'real' accounting system? ;-)
I haven't seen the schema. Do you store both the 'ledger balance'
and the 'trial balance' (i forget what its called), i
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
>
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:46:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > >
> > > It should be clear why Transaction engine and DB engine should stay close;
> > > they will need to communicate quite
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:06:02AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> >
> > In my design, the database will be maintaining the balance. So does
> > that mean gnucash will be a 'real' accounting system? ;-)
>
> I haven't seen the schema. Do you store
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 11:38:40AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 02:46:51AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > It's been rumoured that [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > > >
> > > > It should be clear why Transaction eng
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> Not with each transaction, which is unwieldy in case of edits. current
> balance, cleared balance and reconciled balance are all stored with
> the account.
>
> Additionally, there is a checkpointing mechanism, whereby the three
> balances are recorded
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
>
> Do you mean to
> set a "lock" (not a real DB lock though, or at least not necessarily a
> real DB lock) when the user BEGINS to do an edit, so other users
> cannot? Now THAT makes sense. :-)
Yes. I tend to speak metaphorically.
> > If you think a
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 12:39:17PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> >
> > Do you mean to
> > set a "lock" (not a real DB lock though, or at least not necessarily a
> > real DB lock) when the user BEGINS to do an edit, so other users
> > cannot? Now T
I've made my working directory available for browsing so you can all
look at it if you're interested. I had made the design doc available
previously, but there is now getting to be more files, including
actual sql code. Of course it's not the live directory; it's a
copy made hourly from cron.
Av
David Merrill writes:
>
> Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
> nontrivial and may not make it into the first release. I am already
> becoming rather ruthless about cutting things.
>
> I *do* keep a complete auditing trail, so changes *can* be reversed.
That's very nice
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> David Merrill writes:
> >
> > Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
> > nontrivial and may not make it into the first release. I am already
> > becoming rather ruthless about cutting things.
> >
> > I *do* k
David Merrill writes:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > David Merrill writes:
> > >
> > > Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
> > > nontrivial and may not make it into the first release. I am already
> > > becoming rather ruthless about
On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:57:56PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> David Merrill writes:
> > On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:29:12PM -0800, Dave Peticolas wrote:
> > > David Merrill writes:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I am trying to do it this way if I can. It is decidedly
> > > > nontrivial and may not make
Bill Gribble writes:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2000 at 01:56:45PM +1100, Robert Graham Merkel wrote:
> > Bill, I'm busily working on the pane code, and I need to get the
> > actual widget from a gnc_report_window and shove it in a container.
> >
> > How do I do so?
>
> You do it the other way '
David Merrill writes:
>
> I know that you mean this sincerely. But we really do need to define
> the overall goal/scope of the project. Much has been implied but
> fairly little has been actually laid out.
>
> 1. Are we going to continue support for the local file store?
I think that depends on
Bill,
I think we discussed before how I'd like to be able to pass
a popup menu to a report_window. How difficult would this be
to arrange?
Robert Merkel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We are excited and optimi
Hi David,
Excellent!
It's been rumoured that David Merrill said:
> > Lets assume we are using onc-rpc (or corba or xml-rpc or soap).
> >
> > ** GUI user uses mouse to highlight transaction for editing.
> > ** xaccTransBeginEdit() sends rpc/iiop/xml message to server.
> > ** GUI user types in
31 matches
Mail list logo
