Re: Can people with older RedHat systems test g-wrap-0.9.7?

2000-11-05 Thread Rob Browning
Derek Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I've build 0.9.8 on RedHat 6.2 (I even built a set of RPMS for it > :) > > Unfortunately, it doesn't work for me. The mainline CVS tree doesn't > have any tests for g-wrap against guile 1.3, so it fails to set the > proper SMOB setting. I'm curren

Re: Memory leaks in 1.4.x

2000-11-05 Thread Rob Browning
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The status is that the const-string fixes with 0.9.6 made it > possible to fix these problems. I can send the patch to Dave > whenever, but it'd probably be best to delay doing the release until > we have a good g-wrap release (which I think we'

Re: Another bug

2000-11-05 Thread Rob Browning
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It doesn't appear to be a RAM problem (top shows that the memory > used stays static), and the symptoms vary according to the guile > version used. It appears to be a problem with the design of the > transaction report's HTML generator functions

Report from multi-page printing (ugly)

2000-11-05 Thread Robert Graham Merkel
Five minutes of playing with the transaction report revealed the following rather disturbing behaviour from gtkhtml/gnome-print: At the moment, it appears that what gtkhtml/gnome-print does is imitate a roll-paper fax machine with a very dumb paper cutter - it prints a fixed-size block onto each

Re: Another bug

2000-11-05 Thread Robert Graham Merkel
Rob Browning writes: > Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > No, nothing like that. I've traced the crash with gdb, and it > > happens in g-wrap generated code calling a C string->scm type > > conversion function with what appears to be a legitimate C string. > > Odd. >

Re: Memory leaks in 1.4.x

2000-11-05 Thread Rob Browning
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In the process of trying (unsuccessfully) to locate a (confirmed) > crash in 1.4.x if you try and do a transaction report with a large > number of transaction report, I've tracked down several memory leaks. > > They are by no means severe (we're

Re: Another bug

2000-11-05 Thread Rob Browning
Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, nothing like that. I've traced the crash with gdb, and it > happens in g-wrap generated code calling a C string->scm type > conversion function with what appears to be a legitimate C string. > Odd. Any chance this is a "running out of RAM"

Re: Memory leaks in 1.4.x

2000-11-05 Thread Robert Graham Merkel
Rob Browning writes: > Robert Graham Merkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In the process of trying (unsuccessfully) to locate a (confirmed) > > crash in 1.4.x if you try and do a transaction report with a large > > number of transaction report, I've tracked down several memory leaks. >

Re: Stock Splits, Stock Dividends, Mergers, etc.

2000-11-05 Thread Rob Browning
Bill Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > date descr acct bought sold price value totshare balance > 9/14/00 Price 15 50 750 > 9/15/00 Stock Div 250 0 75 0 > 9/15/00 Price 10