Excellent, thanks!
On 20 February 2014 02:33, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 February 2014 15:18:03 Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > > > - remove the old content where we can, possibly moving the old
> > > > tarballs to sourceforge
> >
> > Re: bandwidth: I expect to get a 1 gigabit fiber opti
>
> > - remove the old content where we can, possibly moving the old tarballs
> > to sourceforge
>
Re: bandwidth: I expect to get a 1 gigabit fiber optic within the next 6
months or so, maybe sooner, and so should be able to support dramatically
more content.
> - install a permanent redirect to
This caught my eye:
> >> Besides, it's rather
> >> hard to argue that gnucash belongs there in any form, since we're not
> >> part of Gnome.
>
> Linas could explain the historical relations.
>
GnuCash is one of the founding members of the Gnome Foundation. I helped
draft the Articles of Incorp
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 15:18:03 Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > > - remove the old content where we can, possibly moving the old
> > > tarballs to sourceforge
>
> Re: bandwidth: I expect to get a 1 gigabit fiber optic within the
> next 6 months or so, maybe sooner, and so should be able to suppor
Am 19.02.2014 16:20, schrieb Geert Janssens:
> On Wednesday 19 February 2014 07:08:45 John Ralls wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>> John Ralls writes:
:
>> You could do that with www.gnucash.org, but master.gnome.org (the
>> developer side of ftp.gnome.org) is highly a
On Wednesday 19 February 2014 07:08:45 John Ralls wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> > John Ralls writes:
> >>> I think keeping around history is a good thing.
> >>> Disk is cheap.
> >>> Just mark it an archive and add a README to the current
> >>> location(s)
> >>
> >>
On Feb 19, 2014, at 6:51 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>>> I think keeping around history is a good thing.
>>> Disk is cheap.
>>> Just mark it an archive and add a README to the current location(s)
>>
>> As I said, the history is preserved in git.
>
> It's not quite the sam
John Ralls writes:
>> I think keeping around history is a good thing.
>> Disk is cheap.
>> Just mark it an archive and add a README to the current location(s)
>
> As I said, the history is preserved in git.
It's not quite the same as "release tarballs".
> With the old collections on www.gnucas
On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:58 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> John Ralls writes:
>
>>> Question is: should we keep providing downloads for these old versions
>>> in the interest of archaeology ? If so the path should stay.
>>>
>>> If not what do we do with the historical news messages ?
>>>
>>
>> Del
John Ralls writes:
>> Question is: should we keep providing downloads for these old versions
>> in the interest of archaeology ? If so the path should stay.
>>
>> If not what do we do with the historical news messages ?
>>
>
> Delete it all. I see no benefit to maintaining archival tarballs. I
On Feb 18, 2014, at 1:23 AM, Geert Janssens wrote:
> On Thursday 09 January 2014 10:10:05 John Ralls wrote:
>> I'm reviewing/updating README in response to
>> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721608 , and there's a
>> link there to the subject URI.
>>
>> It looks like the sources ther
On Thursday 09 January 2014 10:10:05 John Ralls wrote:
> I'm reviewing/updating README in response to
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721608 , and there's a
> link there to the subject URI.
>
> It looks like the sources there stopped being updated at the end of
> 2010 when we released
12 matches
Mail list logo
