Re: reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread Jim Shepherd
Dave Peticolas wrote: > > Either it's a bug in the Helix rpms, or the person reporting > the bug didn't have their gnome-print-devel package installed. > If you get the helix code rpms, you need to grab the -devel > package, too (it's at the bottom of the page where their packages > are listed)

Re: reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread Dave Peticolas
> >The output format wasn't very intuitive. I just made some > >changes to try and improve things. Let me know if this makes > >more sense, or if things still seem wrong. > > This is much better but I think there is an inconsistency. I have set up > some accounts to track this year's expenses an

Re: reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread Scott Haug
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:37:10PM -0700, Dave Peticolas wrote: > > David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I tried the check-printing function and got a warning that I needed > > > gnome-print libraries installed. I have gnome-print-0.12-1 installed. > > > > The check printing stuff is

Re: reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread Dave Peticolas
> David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I tried the check-printing function and got a warning that I needed > > gnome-print libraries installed. I have gnome-print-0.12-1 installed. > > The check printing stuff is really implemented, I swear :) It works > just fine on a Debian system wit

Re: reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread Jim Shepherd
Bill Gribble wrote: > > I believe this has been reported as a bug in the Helix rpms; someone > correct me if that's not right. > > b.g. > Yes, I reported this bug to HelixCode (bug #266), but have not heard anything other than an automated repsonse that the bug report was accepted by the sys

Re: reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread Bill Gribble
David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried the check-printing function and got a warning that I needed > gnome-print libraries installed. I have gnome-print-0.12-1 installed. The check printing stuff is really implemented, I swear :) It works just fine on a Debian system with the gnome-

reports_(and_printing)

2000-04-05 Thread David Bobroff
>The output format wasn't very intuitive. I just made some >changes to try and improve things. Let me know if this makes >more sense, or if things still seem wrong. This is much better but I think there is an inconsistency. I have set up some accounts to track this year's expenses and non-employ